Since folks are posting non-RV-specific items here...

If the Good ETs are indeed contacting "us" and active, despite the risks, one might assume they are familiar with Farsight (as you've indicated) -- one might also assume they can read these forums and figure out the demographic, levels of interest, mind and participation. Now, if I were a Good ET I might use this list of people to consider contacting. If not to encourage.

But that's not happening.

The human element of this is important. Many of us rely on the narratives to inform us, but more interaction, more "reality" is what is going to save the day.

Now we're talking escalated conflict in the world and "global war". Seems like we're veering away from "catastrophic disclosure" and just to the "catastrophic" part of human life. So how far is this going to be allowed to go?

Lots of questions need answering.

Hi Aziz,

I've seen you engage in telepathic communication with insectoid aliens, reptilians, greys, and other non-human beings in various FarSight projects. Have you had any success in communicating with earth animals telepathically? Like a dog, bird, or fish?

Some good questions among the comments here.

Question: We are all ONE...so answer this.

The RVers receive a target. It's given to them by an individual who knows the target specifics--its identity, its location and its possibilities as well as others who may have designed the coordinates. The RVers are not receiving the information or doing their work inside a faraday cage. Not that I think it would help once the information is available, just sayin'.

How do you know that after the RVers receive the coordinates and begin looking into them that they are not picking up information from each other's attempt to RV the target?

Reason: Once the All-That-Is has been given information it goes into the ether available to everyone who has the ability to see/find it. Seems there is a huge possibility that they could be repeating, at least in part, each other's information as they focus on the target. Are any of them skilled enough to know from experience or FEEL that the difference between information they would get from an actual coordinated target and any information from other RVers (and anyone else) who are viewing the same coordinates for the same reason is different?

How do you reconcile the Lacerta assertations that humanity is a

genetically modified created species, with us all being mind-wiped immortal ISBE's

who ultimately birth ourselves from the fundamental source of life.

Doed this mean that as ISBE's, the human bodies were genetically

created to be traps which host ISBE's during physical life, or as Lacerta states, we were monkeys that got tweaked to enable rapid evolution in a cosmically significantly smaller timeframe?

The Lacerta rapid evolution assertion is borne out by the single gene modification which (now scientifically proven) separates Homo Sapiens from previous Homo iterations; does this then imply that there are potentially parallel "levels" of humanity existing simultaneously; i.e. better developed ISBE's have been trapped in biological bodies (And bought here, say, by Oumouamua or different means), and others have eveolved from lower states of being as Lacerta implies, but because we all inhabit these bodies we see each other as colectively human, what are your thoughts on the reconcilliation of this?

Do you think human bodies which have been genetically modified to provide a sufficiently complex neural network specifically to be able to "trap" ISBE's and that this could be a way of reconciling what looks to be a paradox, if both are true?

There are a few other points from MacElroy which cross over with these questions, but its a complex subject so I don't want to bring a third source in to the discussion for the time being :-)

Many of the ET related viewing sessions seem to focus on our traditional view of aliens i.e. as being other physical entities from different places in our common perception of physical reality; or from non-physical beings from other dimensions which are still fundamentally part of our physical experience. There are meant to be a number of forces operating on the planet atm which are from fundamentally different bubbles, which I conceptualize as entirely different modes of existence which do not align with ways we are used to thinking about, but this may be an incorrect definition. Do you have any thoughts or views on what these parties from other bubbles are doing here and how their narrative fits in to the Reptilian / Domain / Galactic federation narrative? Also, the main bad Reptilians are meant to be from another bubble, is this another physical reality, a different universe or an entirely different conceptual paradigm? The fact they are physical and here would suggest its a separate physical reality, but I'm not certain for the time being.

What is something tangible we can do to help facilitate catastrophic disclosure? Most Earth humans can't wrap their heads around remote viewing, telepathy, invisibility, etc. I'm at a loss on how disclosure can happen without showing the masses anything tangible.

Have you ever read or heard of the books Sasquatch: Message to Humanity or Kalask: The Reptilian Question?

1. Farsight focuses heavily on "what is happening" but lacks guidance on "what to do" and in what order. This kind of leaves everyone on their own to figure things out - which is fine, but some guidance and a straightforward plan for those who want to follow it would really be appreciated. Could you provide this either now or in the short future?
2. Both you and Courtney have done extensive research on a lot of interesting topics outside of your main focus. Courtney's Caloric Restriction diet is one example. The intelligence briefings are incredibly useful for viewers to obtain a general overview, but are lacking on specific instructions for a lot of things. It would be seriously appreciated if you and Courtney could either write a book or make a video series going *very* in depth on such topics of "general life advice", since you have spent your lives researching them - and the Farsight viewers have only seen a short overview. Could you provide this either now or in the short future?
3. What is your opinion on animals and eating them? I know Courtney is vegetarian, but I don't believe he ever explained why. Can we reincarnate as an animal? Do animals have souls? How about bugs, fish, and plants? An answer on this topic is really important, in my opinion.

Aziz, is it possible or have you'll ever tried to create a target where the target itself is a close protected room where all the viewers come together and communicate telepathically/remote viewing each other seeing each other, since all realities are happening here and now it doesn't matter when each one communicates with the other to express something except for the timeline that we are collectively in now psychically.
This also remindes me of Yemmé describing that before doing the remote viewing project on her way to the studio she was already connecting consciously with elements of the target without knowing what it was or why, which remindes me also about this time slip that our higher minds or consciousness experience, meaning this could be also a way of knowing when someone is connecting to the "room", much like the project on star wars where a group gather themselves in a protective energy bubble to have meetings, or also like the grays project where we saw a gray being talking to the viewer while a good portion of its consciousness was in another place doing other stuffs or even in Halo series where they put the device in their forehead so they can access the room without those that are present there psychically can't perceive them.

Hi Aziz.

Like many others have said, many many thanks for doing this! I think it's really important for the community to feel that you guys do listen to us (more than we usually see on the forums or comments on videos.

I have a few Qs for you...

Given that the most important thing about FS is that it gets the word out to the public, AND that staying on the ET angle will tend to turn most people off, would it not be MUCH better to do something significantly more practical with the RV sessions that the people can get their teeth into? Such as - make the CICO+ information MUCH MUCH MUCH cheaper... One of the biggest and, to an extent, fair criticisms of the validity of RV is that you don't hear much about the millionaires who won by RVing the lottery - or at least the stock market (yes, bypassing those projects that have been published - *after* the event). So, would it not be massively beneficial to publish the names/identities of the various cryptos and their projections, so that everyone can see just how good RV (in general) and FS (in particular) actually is. Once people accept that the CICOs are accurate, then it'll bring it a LOT of people, and disclosure will happen a LOT faster - as it gives credibility when other projects are done. (also, another legitimate criticism of any 'fortune telling' is - why charge so much, when you can just get the numbers and become rich yourself?)

This could also be done on a per crypto basis... if you want to know how BTC will do in the next 5 years, it will cost you $100 (or less). Rather than having to pay $5000 (which, let's face it, is 'elites' level of money, and I seriously doubt you've had *many* takers... who probably don't need to know ...not compared to the rest of us who struggle.)

(To be honest, this fairly large paywall falls into the 'if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem' category)

Aligned with this, people should be able to request a certain crypto to be RVed by FS (and sold - obviously).

Secondly, although FS is using its own methodology for RV, would it not be a good idea to suggest various other practices to help with RV. I know the word 'meditation' gets thrown around a lot, but for complete newbies, their next question would be "what's that actually entail?" (probably without using those words :p) Such as... Silva Mind Control Method/Silva Ultramind for getting into a very quick, reliable alpha/theta level. What about binaural beats? etc etc...

Similar to the above, but is there a plan to RV various authors or the contents of various books that have been thrown about a bit recently? Lue Elizondo would be an obvious one these days, Also, RVing Steven Greer & co. FFG recently (a few months ago) did a project on Bob Lazar.

Also, is FS going to proffer up TRNs for forum members to do? It would be good to do this on a regular basis, for a number of reasons. Firstly, it shows interaction with the community, and makes people feel involved. Secondly, it would mean an 'official' targetting, instead of just the ones that people throw up on the forums every so often. It would also be good if the forum members could do the same targets as the FS team, to see how they go (and, potentially, for FS to see the talent that is on the boards here). As against, only those who pay the money to learn the SRV methodology...

Ok,. that's all I can think of for now....

BE well!

Hi Aziz,

Thank you for taking some questions. Here are mine:
* When you remote view the past and communicate with a subject, what do you think is happening mechanically? Are you seeing and interacting with an alternate reality or perhaps something else?
* Have you ever had a telepathic communication with another Earth human such as another remote viewer? If not what do you think is the cause of the inability to communicate?

That's pretty much it.

hi aziz & courtney,

thanks for the opportunity to post questions and potentially have them answered. my question is for you, aziz:

are you 100% aligned with your father, with respect to the direction FS takes? what are your short-term [within the next year] goals for FS? along the same lines, do you have the autonomy to pick targets, that you believe are the most-appropriate, given your prior knowledge, and having your own interpretations of what you think the current state of affairs are with respect to your goals for FS?

if not, would CB allow for you to have your own "corner", where you're given the autonomy to do so?

the reason for these questions is simple. family members, at times, may have different directions they would take, to achieve similar goals. this can be the case, in a multitude of meaningful ways, and could lead to more-desirable outcomes, given varying approaches. is this possible with FS?

respectfully,
phoeniX

Okay, ready for another round.

This question (or set of questions) is fairly complicated, I'll try to keep it concise.

One of courtney's interviews, he talks about how a typical "trip" on an ET craft is with your conscious avatar. I don't want to say "isbe" in this context because that's a more all encompassing word.

This avatar is not possible to use to free you. For example, they can't just take this avatar, remove it from the death traps, and assume that you will now be removed for good. But it's enough to give you a conscious experience outside your body to see the ship as is. And supposedly everyone is using this avatar self on the ships, because they want the ship to remain clean. It doesn't give off perspiration, and defacation, and skin shedding, and urine, and so on. It's almost like a virtual reality version of yoruself.

Core question here: Can you help me make that makes sense in my mind?

I mean, why does it have to exist as your residual self image, built specifically in a shape meant to digest food and process oxygen and organize muscles. If it doesn't process anything materially, why can't you make it a sphere with a bunch of tendrils that just grabs things and doesn't run out of energy.

If you look at our bodies, it's basically a vertical tubular factory, taking in materials to build and repair its constituent parts, process it for energy, and remove old unused pieces. None of that would make any sense to have if we didn't use it to process all these materials continuously.

Related supporing question: Courtney's daughter was born as a test tube. Surely she needed to process all these materials and digest, growing in these test tubes. Does her "real body" just exist somewhere else and her avatar float on the ship? And if this residual image is not dependant on material, can it even be attacked? What disintegrates it if it has no dependency on material?

I feel like before courtney said he boards these craft outside of his body, it all made sense to me. When he says he goes up like it's all a dream, it makes it all sound make believe. That's not to say the craft are undetectable or remote viewing isn't real, because I see that it is. But this whole non-body body is just nonsensical to me. Why would it exist? For what function? If it doesn't even depend on a real body, why even limit its muscular ability or shape? What mechanism would limit these things? Just the person's beliefs?

Hello Aziz, thankyou for looking through the questions and answering them.

Here is my first batch of questions 😁

1. Do you think Farsight (Courtney and your Remote Viewing Team) would ever do a LIVE webinar series? or possibly a yearly Online Conference with Workshops?

2. Would you or any of the Remote Viewing Team ever be available on an App like MINNECT to discuss Remote Viewing?

3. Some Farsight members meet bi-weekly to hold a FS Remote Viewing Zoom Meeting and discuss all things RV, ETs, Cryptids, Methods, and our new discoveries of RV interest. It won't be long before we celebrate our 50th Meeting. Is there any chance that you, or another FS Team member, would join us to be our Special Guest for 30 minutes or so, when that happens? 😜

4. What instrument do you play? and what type of music do you enjoy creating, or listening to?

5. What instruments or Musical Talents do the rest of the Team have?

6. Was Harvey ever asked about the Miami Mall ET incident?

7. Will there ever be a chance to put some questions to Harvey from the Farsight subscriber members?

Thank-you so much Aziz!

Hi, you guys are amazing, thank you for doing what you're doing.

First, some constructive feedback. I think you're process is fantastic, but my main feedback is that your analysis on viewing data (or interpretation of world events, past/present/possible-futures) is limited to yourselves. In general I think most would find your analysis and interpretation to be solid, but every once in a while I have a feeling like "I'm sorry, but I respectfully sense your conclusion is a bit off for x, y, z reason"

I'm glad you've set up these AMA forums since it's a start, but I wonder if there could be a way to have more structured ways to crowd source opinions/analysis on data per project (in a way that protects from the sad practice of the odd malevolent intel community member spoiling it).

For example, you did a project on Elon Musk, and the conclusion is that he's a fantastic great guy. Elon has been one of my heros, but recently I can't rule out a scenario where he's a deceptive populist that actually is on the side of (or under control of) the malevolent ETs. His behavior recently seems more like a fascist cult of personality on the rise.

Finally can I ask why you don't have a way to engage with the community on more popular sites like Discord? You could gate access for Farsight Prime members only.

In one of the "Ask Harvey" blips Harvey remarks that we call them the Galactic Federation - what do they call themselves and can you make a flowchart of how their government works, how power is balanced and why legal status of being born on earth is so important.