Not sure why you are complaining about truncating or condensing this thread other than most of the posts are yours. Lots of videos clog a thread quickly.
You say “no progress regarding the traps” despite all we have been learning & sharing? Maybe you are more confused when entertaining so many viewpoints and find nothing resonating with you. It has with me. Don’t use Farsight as an only source or information on the topic but many. Courtney constantly refers other people, books, and videos as you do as well. Says checkout yourself. I do. You?
No progress, clue, or insights? I’m sure you mean from Farsight however disagree. Beyond FS you must have learned much from all presented here and from others - whether FS aligned or not. There have been many people mentioned here or elsewhere I have checked out that support the death trap scenario beyond FS and many times before them. Tena and Karen, regression and healing therapists of Quantum Healing, found their patients were tricked into reincarnation. The spirit guides appeared as reptilians when they gave suggestion for subject to see them as physically appeared before this session. Many excellent interviews are on a series called Cosmic Disclosure on Gaia channel. BTW don’t believe Elena at all.
Finally with regard to evading the trap there is hope. Believe if we prepare before death with raising our vibration and consciousness especially with informed choices in 4D we can escape it as Jesus said in the First Apocalypse of James. Self hypnosis to not return to the light, can hopefully negate or lessen their post hypnotic suggestion to return to it from the last time.
This topic, what I have learned, and now what I must do have given me an opportunity to be a better person at the least and a spirit that reincarnate freely or perhaps choose to not at all at best.
No it’s not FS’s court the ball is in. It’s always in ours. They will not be beside you after death. Prepare.

I am not talking about personal progress which makes it more likely that you can pass through. These efforts will not change the status quo or modus operandi of the traps itself.
FS's standard approach was to get rid of them, or at least change the situation, for the benefit of all of humanity.
There are no efforts or results visible within the last 12 months from FS's side.
Maybe there were efforts made, but obviously they failed, otherwise another project would have been published.
If i have missed it, then please point me to that project/publication/discussion.

BTW, some of my posts have been deleted, and not by me.

I previously mentioned the parable of the elephant and the blind “observers“, who came to different conclusions of what an elephant is. This parable goes actually much deeper than it appears.
It stands for the concept of “Biocentrism“, where the manifested reality is dependent on the observer:
The observer determines which reality he/she observes. Translated to the traps, it means, dependend on the individual, the trap will manifest a specific reality, only experienced by the individual. The individuals who are going through the trap, have obviously a certain quality which most do not have.
According to FS's data, these individuals exist, so what is the keyquality which unlocks the trap?

Well, HELL NO!!
Don't you dare ask that question!!
Because in the „“Alien Interview“ it is stated that only Buddha has passed through, and nobody else since. That MUST be true. Long live the Dogma!!
LOL, well, that is CB's POV.

You don't believe me?
Here is the quote of CB's bible, “Alien Interview“ , page 184 of 190:
“Airl mentioned that the most significant breakthrough was made by Gautama Siddhartha about 2,500 years ago. However, the original teachings and techniques taught by The Buddha have been altered or lost over the millennia since then. The practical techniques of his philosophy were perverted into robotic religious rituals by priests as a self-serving instrument of control or
slavery.“

Here you have it:
CB' bible states that only Buddha was able to pass through, but the data shows something different.
FS is not acting according to their own data, but only according to an incorporated, fixed concept.
This is the circle in which FS rotates: Having a pre-fixed concept of reality and keeping that concept, even if FS's own data shows something contrary.
Would a bit more flexibility not be appropriate?

According to FS-data, these individuals exist, so would it not be interesting to see what qualities an individual has to have, in order to pass through the trap?
Would it not be interesting to know what is best to do, to acquire the ability to pass through?
Would it not be interesting to RV the mode/route which FS has to pursue in the future, in order to dramatically change the current situation into a more positive one?

This approach would be much better than sitting on the beach and asking Harvey: “What should FS do to fix the problem?“
Alone, the asking of that type of question, shows that the concept of free will and self-determination of humanity is not well understood by CB.
Harvey would never answer that question, because he knows that it would be a gross interference in a major problem-solving process, which Terrans have to solve by themselves.

And then you wonder why there is no progress on the subject of the traps?
If you don't change yourself, then you might even come to the conclusion that it is impossible to change anything and that it would be best to just blow up everything....
The real reason is within you and that it is obviously not possible for you to change, Mr. Lone Wolf!

More on “Biocentrism“ here:

My advice: Incorporate the theoretical standards into your daily life, into practical action and deeds.
Just walk the walk, don't talk the talk !

As for people escaping the death traps - What about Robert Monroe? He'd be a good target to look into.

CB, they are calling you:

MB, Loved this video. Yippie I Oh…Yippie I A, FARSIGHT got us recording the skies….😀

Let me state first, that FS has not made ANY progress regarding the biggest problem of Terrans: The Net/Grid/Death-Trap problem.
Nothing new has been published regarding the traps for more than a year!!!
It seems that FS has run into a dead end (as predicted and expected), and is searching for a way out to go further...

The “IT'S A TRAP, FOLKS“ news, is – at best – a cry for a renewal of the discussion, in order to correct the mistakes by FS and find a new basis, or - at worst – a new low in FS's performance.
So, let's be positive and see it as a call for help in solving the problem.

But, first things first:
Regarding the evidence, that FS is intentionally withholding information of the true nature of the traps/net, let us re-visit “THE ESCAPE“ :

https://www.farsightprime.com/videos/farsight-mysteries-41-the-escape

The first target given by CB is:“The central and most important control facility for the amnesia machines that affects earth-humans at the current time and are referred to as Death-Traps in FS-projects.“
(at 10:50)

This target-description is general, but good, as it leads us straight to the centre of the action.
Once there, it is very useful to DMP the overseer/leader of the operation, as it would give the overall information of intent and purpose of this installation. Then, later, a DMP of other, lower ranking individuals can provide more detailed information.

As a comparision, this important interaction by the Monroe Institut with the leader of the trap-operation has been recorded here:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140226230152/http://www.afterlife-knowledge.com/reentry.html

It depicts a benevolent school-scenario.
But that interaction is not a DMP by FS, which might provide more information of the intent and purpose of the operation.
Therefore it would be crucial to DMP the overseer of operations in a manner acceptable manner by FS-standards, as it would either corrobrate or contradict the previous provided info.

AGAIN:
THE DMP OF THE LEADER IS ABSOLUTELY CRUCIAL IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE TRUE NATURE OF THE NET/TRAP.

So, lets see what FS has provided:
At 23:00, Aziz starts going into the facility and draws the overseer and two lower ranking individuals., so that he can DMP them individually.
Then at 28:14, after a discourse on his previous adventure, he states “looking more into this guy (the overseer)...“
But then, what happens: CUT !!!
The next scene is smoothly blended in, but it is not the DMP of the overseer, but a DMP of the guy on the console, who has a technical mind. After that it shifts to a ship and the overseer is never mentioned again.

WHERE IS THE DMP OF THE OVERSEER???
IT HAS BEEN CUT OUT!!!

Not only has it been cut out, but the cut has been smoothly hidden through video-editing technique, so that most of the viewers are being fooled into the illusion of a continuous presentation. This leads to the conclusion that it was

INTENTIONALLY CUT OUT AND THEN CAMOUFLAGED !!!

This deception has worked smoothly, up to today.

So, the question is:

WHY WAS THE DMP CUT OUT ?

There is only one possible answer:
The DMP of the overseer has provided info, which does NOT align with the evil trap story which is propagandated here on FS.
Therefore it had to disappear !!!
The person editing this sequence was well aware that a hard cut would draw too much attention to the cut, therefore a smooth blending-option was chosen, which obfuscated the cut!
And it had worked, until now.

THIS VIDEO-EDITING HAS ALL THE HALLMARKS OF AN INTENTIONAL DECEPTION, BY WITHHOLDING CRUCIAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE DEATH-TRAP!!!

This is the real “information-climate“ here on FS, where “Truth“ is being presented.

This deception has backfired, as only a truthful and honest discussion can lead to a practical solution of the problem, and thus FS got stuck in a quagmire.

I have watched the escape multiple times... I couldn't figure it out. I just came to the conclusion that we are not able to disable the traps.

Well, this is a non-response by this community to a VERY BIG problem within FS.
It is a pity.

Dear CB,
FS has not gotten anywhere near to solving the problem of the Death Traps.
The reason for this dilemma is:
The projects “The Escape“ and “The Death-Traps“ were neither having proper targeting, nor was the conclusions derived from the data correct.
What does this mean?

First the target-formulation:
In “The Death-traps“ at 11:00 the chosen target time-period has been the 21st century.
You obviously assumed, that by choosing that period, you have covered everything:
The operation of the traps in the beginning of the 21st century, as well as the non-operation in the future, when it is assumed that the traps have been destroyed.
But by having that assumption, you lose some vital information, because you will not know the reason why the uninhibited human is not affected.
The unanswered question is: Do they escape, because the death traps are destroyed or is it that the human has a specific quality, which provides a sort of protection against the traps?

If a target-time-period within the 20th century would have been chosen, then the data would have answered that question. That would have led to further questions.
But your own conjecture, that only the destruction of the death traps within the 21st century would enable the inhibited transition during death, has led you into this dead end.
Your position is: All questions answered, where is the need to ask more? LOL

Next, the target-formulation in “The Escape“ :

At 1:21:45 “A future timeline which contains the most effective and best method by which humans are able to neutralize (evade, counter, or disable) the “Death Traps amnesia machines“ “ .
That timeline is then viewed and it turns out, that in that timeline, the GF and the Domain are fighting together, in order to destroy the traps.

This is a very problematic target-formulation:
First, we live in a universe of unlimited possibilities, where nearly any timeline exists. You can RV virtually anything. The question is: How probable is it?
RV will not give you any feedback of how probable it is, if it has not been tasked.

Second, that chosen timeline includes the neutralization/disabling of the function of the traps, which, as i explained in previous pages, will also diminish the flow of Loosh, which is the energy used in higher dimensions.
Therefore, it is only in a very, very unlikely constellation or timeline, where the GF, together with the Domain, will destroy the machinery on the moon.
The probability of that particular timeline is maybe a one in a trillion, and is therefore nearly impossible.
The probability of that particular timeline can be easily verified : Just ask Harvey, whether he can imagine to work with the Domain together, in order to destroy the traps!!

Third, about the conjecture, that “Disclosure“ will lead to the destruction of the traps.
Which data supports this idea?
This idea seems to be born out of helplessness. It is nothing more than a desperate theory, invented to camouflage the inability to effect any changes in the traps-system.

I understand that the previous projects were based on a very limited understanding of cosmic realities. This has led to inprecise taskings and this into the quagmire of improbable timelines.
I hope that FS is working it's way out through this and is learning and evolving.
Therefore, to move forward, it is required that the object of “The Death-Traps“ is being re-visited, with new target-formulations, which reflect the new understanding.

Several threads have criticized Farsight for what the organisation selects to view or not, and for how the information is presented. It wouldn't surprise me if FS is constrained in some way and is only free to cover certain areas or do so to a certain depth.

However, clear instructions and many examples are given on how to remote view and we are continually enjoined to learn this skill so we can look for ourselves. The partial information given is like an invitation to view these specific areas.

Expecting this, or any other organisation, to provide all the answers is accepting powerlessness.

Now, as the sobering-up has started, let's point it out again (as i had previously on this forum):
FS will NOT succeed in pushing the real “Disclosure“ into the main-stream.
It was a very unprobable scenario in the first place:
The timeframe of this to happen, is very limited, to ~ end of next year, according to FS-data (the „Aftermath“-data).
This has become even more improbable, because how will CB not drown in the current tsunami of MSM-disclosure?
CB got just bulldozed!
How goes the saying? Strength in Numbers!
This is not surprising.

Instead of an honest disclosure of all the nefarious acts by ET+Cabal, we will get quite the opposite:
Either a general whitewash of the ET-activities (ala Stephen Greer) and then the presentation of these “good“ ET's to the public,
or maybe the false flag, then the rescue by intervention of the “good“ §ET's, with the “good“ ET's winning.
Both scenaria will end up with a clear identification of the “good“ ET's towards the public.
Let me repeat: Whatever scenario will play out, in the end the ET's will be presented as a “good“ guys (Which they are not!).

But, what else do you realistically expect?

The main question is:
The rush in disclosure is obvious, but why?
CB says “something is coming“...
The answer is:
They have to meet a deadline.
Why a deadline? Because a cosmic clock is ticking.

The acceptance of the ET's by the general population has to be achieved before the next phase, and this next phase is tied to a cosmic clock: The approach of a big, cosmic body.

So, the next phase of deception is the “evacuation“-scenario, because Earth is supposedly about to be hit by a BIG cosmic body. When this body will become visible to the general public, then the “evacuation“-offer will be made by the ET's.
This scenario is therefore dependent on the cosmic clock, which is ticking.

“Disclosure“ didn't work, so what is left for FS to do?

I think that FS has an even bigger fish to fry, a cosmic giant fish:
THE DEATH TRAPS

The problem is in the thinking of CB:
He thinks, that “Disclosure by CB“ will result in an unshackeling of Humanity, which then will go to the moon, and smash these traps.
That was his scenario, which i criticized from the very beginning as complete fantasy, as it was not even based on facts.
Now, as even the first step in this scenario – Disclosure ala CB – is not happening, what are the chances of the destruction of the traps in this way: Zero.
It was near-zero from the very beginning, as i pointed out here on this forum, about a year ago.

I am not saying that there are zero chances to change the situation with the traps,
i am saying that CB's envisaged way had zero chances from the very start.

So, my suggestion is, to re-start focussing onto the trap-problem from a different angle, as this is not out of reach of FS.
I repeat: This trap-problem can be solved by FS!

The problem is: CB and his rigid thinking.

Quote:
“A mind is like a parachute. It does't work, if it is not open“ (Frank Zappa)

Larry, please stick to your Gold forecasts, and not on what you think you know and others don't know.
I told you before to give me a break.