This is an AMAZING interview:

In the respective Time Cross project, Farsight seemed to miss a lot about what's really going on:

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/videos/malaysia-flight-370-farsight

I assume because of how the target was worded, focusing on the pilot. According to the data and theory presented in the interview above, the pilot wasn't the problem at all. Yeme saw something burning very hot, which could be the burning lithium ion batteries.

I suggest to revisit the flight with a more precise target wording, as well as viewing the orbs surrounding the airplane and why they did what they did.

I'm transcribing this now. There's a thread I put up suggesting Courtney should talk to Ashton.
If you look at the Immaculate Constellation Papers, you can see the connection. What is said in that paper makes Ashtons theory credible.

(maybe) Plan A was to release the videos of the plane and the orbs. Then when very few people cared about the videos, plan B was to feed Ashton info slowly with a consistently developing mystery narrative to develop interest in MH370.

Maybe the later stages will involve unveiling which defense contractor has flying orb technology, and in our brains we will have already labeled them as the scumbags that kidnap our people.

The evidence so far points to a possibility that Malaysia Flight 370 is a protected target just like Epstein, which could explain why Farsight's viewers have been distracted.

It seems to me Ashton is here to transform a negative terrible state crime... into a positive fascinating story with ufo's. With the possibilty the passengers still alive somewhere.

FFG has remote viewed this event with at least 4 viewers in 2022.
FS did a very short sloppy session with 2 viewers in 2018.
I have done a serious session on this myself.

It seems pretty clear the plane was hacked, sabotaged and shot... and all or most people died.

It was a black operation.

And yes Ashton is correct: it seems some ADVANCED TECH was used to cloak or teleport the plane. It is very weird. This is a serious possibility.

"It seems to me Ashton is here to transform a negative terrible state crime... into a positive fascinating story with ufo's. With the possibilty the passengers still alive somewhere."

Well, if there's a possibility that the victims of a crime could have survived, most people tend to hope for the best. Doesn't have to be an agenda. But the probability is not very high. If they wanted to get rid of the people inside the plane, why bother with keeping them alive in a secret location for years?

I would suggest remote viewers look a little closer:

1. Were the pilot and copilot killed/disabled early on and was the actual pilot a hijacker?