thanks so much. I had no idea they already did this content.

Believe Antarctica story incomplete due to missing part about the inner earth people from Byrds diary

"And if you are in doubt as to the validity of Remote-Viewing then check out their Projects on what REALLY happened regarding 9/11 as well as the JFK-Assassination if you haven't already (Spoiler-Alert : The MSM was not honestly reporting the events as they actually or really happened)"

Ummm - these don't actually 'validate' Remote Viewing at all. They show that the RVers were able to get data from a target - but that does in NO (credible) way indicate that the rest of their data was in any way related to the facts of the situations.

There are, however, other experiments and research which DO validate RV, because they have explicit targets which the Viewers were blind to, and which gave the data of the target *as known*, starting with SRI's Outbounder projects. Similarly, the research done on ARV shows good validity for future forecasting.

I think the "Reps" here refers to Reptilians, not to Republicans.. (granted, not easy to tell the difference anyway ;p)

Ａ： Even I know that NASA. reflects the acronyms of Never A Straight Answer, Not A Space Agency, Need Another Seven Astronauts, etc. NASA certainly released «fake footage» of the so-called «moon-landing» but that doesn't mean humans have never been there (at least twice), and in fact, even from Far-Sight, they have collected data that suggests that humans do exist both on moon & Mars...

Ｂ： I do not believe that the earth is «hurling through space» (or outer-space). I simply do not have a «committed answer» for the sole-purpose of avoiding falling into the belief-trap of dogmatism.

Ｃ： I also do not buy into the main-stream «scientific» explanation for «gravity» as the phenomenon seems to be more-closely related to some form of electro-magnetism but more subtle (probably).

D:： Question for you. How do you explain the former-planet of Maldek ? Far-Sight Data suggests that the «asteroid belt» was once a planet (yes, a planet, although it would probably be a good idea to do projects that remote-view the exact «shape» of each and every «planet» that has ever been named/identified/etc). The history of that «Asteroid-Belt» reveals that it was once a «planet» that «popped like a balloon» upon being attacked. I hope you've actually seen that project...

Ｅ： How do you explain the «pelted by craters "side"» of «Mars» where-as the «other side» of that «planet» seems to be relatively crater-less, and, the Remote-Viewing Data from Far-Sight suggests that it was due to some «inter-stellar» (is that the right word... perhaps inter-galactic, hmm, inter-solar at least) _war_ amongst species that were hostile towards one another ?

Ｆ： Umm, /everything/ exists by Intelligent-Design, a «super-intelligence» in fact, one that happens to be the ULTIMATE-DECEIVER (i.e. : God). Anybody holding on to beliefs that «God is ALL "good"» or «ALL "Love"» or «ONLY "Love"» _seriously_ needs to throw out and throw away that notion, because, the «Secret Identity of Satan the Devil that would be revealed in "End-Times"» is none other than God himself, and, believe it or not, the very Messiah himself has revealed this... http://www.the-testament-of-truth.com/truth/web/dark.htm

Ｇ： Questioning «Flat-Earth "Science"» does not mean that I buy into «established» Globe-Earth Theory as is promoted by Main-Stream «science» so at let me make that clear before I continue...

H： Regarding the «Big Bang» Theory, not even other «astronomers» seem to be up-to-date (or informed) with «newer» evidence that explains/describes the «beginning of this universe» as NOT being «springing from something out of nothing» BUT that this universe first existed as a «microwave-universe» /before/ the «matter/material/solid-stuff» started to «manifest» into existence... I believe more details about this can be found when looking up the «Dual-Brane» Theory of this universe if I remember correctly. Add to that the discoveries of the James-Webb-Telescope and its data has been making the main-stream so-called «scientific» community uncomfortable with controversy over the age of the universe since from their own data there are whole entire galaxies that are even older than the age of this whole entire universe itself.

I： Now this one is good, and, certainly aligns more with questions that Flat-Earth Theory SHOULD be asking, but, for some reason, I seem to have been the only one on Earth that I know of thus far who keeps on responding to people who talk about this «Light Years Away» phenomenon where they believe that the «stars» (and other stuff) that we see in the sky comes from «billions of years ago» and I ask them... what makes you believe that what you are seeing are Light-Emissions from so long ago from such a distance ? Have you considered that, when you take several hundreds of cars and have them all located 20 miles away with the absolute brightest head-lights, all shining towards you, can you really see their head-lights from a distance of 20 miles ? If that bright of light disappears here on earth at night-time, then, what makes you believe that those lights believed to be stars are really from so far away, especially, when you consider all of the «space-debris» (and space-dust) that would and should surely be blocking out all of that light from such a distance from ever reaching our eye-sight ?

Ｊ： And, finally, when you say «our tax» money, are you saying that YOU are a «tax-payer» who WILLINGLY «pays tax» DESPITE having claimed that the VERY «institution(s)» whom you are paying these «taxes» to ARE a bunch of LIARS and DECEIVERS ? Did you know, that, even the very Messiah himself, CONTRARY to the beliefs surrounding the «Render Unto Caesar» TEXTS, did NOT promote NOR encourage the paying of taxes ? You don't have to believe it of course, for, even from the words/writings of the very Messiah himself, the «information» that he provides (injects) into this universe is simply «food» (spiritual) for your «plate» (metaphorical) that you are not required to absorb, for, we can only lead horses to water, but, cannot (and will not) force them to drink, even though it would most-certainly be to their own spiritual-peril to choose to be dogmatic... here are his own words regarding «taxes and Caesar» by the way at this link... http://www.the-testament-of-truth.com/truth/web/caesar.htm

"Operation Highjump proves Nazi-Reps collaboration"

I think you better go back and check your dictionary for the definition of the word 'prove', because those documents do not, in any way, 'prove' anything.

At best, they provide a bit of evidence (and, questionable at best).

Thanks for being thorough with your research and data-checking when responding;
Perhaps it is not the best comparison, but, for there to be lights that are so incredibly bright that they continue to persist to be visible, even after «billions» of years... well, anyway, like you mentioned (and was even similarly worded by the very Messiah himself at various points of his writings), much of «reality» is simply «incomprehensible» to the feeble human-mind, and, perhaps I am just not ready to understand or comprehend the phenomenon of such lights lasting through billions of years of space-debris, although perhaps that debris simply didn't start coming into existence until much later on.

Perhaps that could be a good Remote-Viewing Project, after all, haven't most if not all of the Remote-Viewing Projects done thus far here at Far-Sight been within the co-ordinates of this particular Solar-System or at least Galaxy, rather than anything beyond the reaches of the out-skirts of the Milky Way itself ? From what I remember, when first learning about Astronomy stuff back during I think was my teenage-years, Alpha-Centauri is supposed to be considered the closest Star/Sun to Earth... I am certainly curious as to what kind of Focuses should be assigned to A-C for Remote-Viewing...

I am do what they call «play» a bit of what is called «Devil's Advocate» here...:

Proof is supposed to be in the realm of Mathematics; Science is supposed to be about Evidence.

①　Would an ant be able to «see» a curve ? Probably also never. Well, for a clearer picture of what I mean, let us take the example of a 20-mile-long straight road, a 20-metre ruler, a really long rod or anything similar for illustrations-purposes. If a physical-road is straight-and-narrow, but, has just enough of a /slight/ curvature, such that, were it possible to pick up the road and set it down on a humongous-table (a FLAT one), that the middle/centre of the road, does in fact, leave a gap of a quarter or half-mile, is that curvature even going to be perceptible ? Then we can try taking a 20-metre-length ruler, also place it upon a huge table (a FLAT one), similar to the previous example, and, were it to have enough of a curvature to leave a one or two-inch gap at the centre/middle part of the table, the object would indeed be curved, but, would an ant that is crawling on said elongated object be able to perceive any curvature ?

Re : Look and See With Your Own Eyes
You should know about the phenomenon called «Optical-Illusions» by now. Various web-sites (and even social-media-videos) should exist to where it can be demonstrated that the squares (or other shapes) only appear darker that the other squares or that a line only looks longer than it really is, but, because of the various shades and/or colour-juxtapositions, etc., the eye was «tricked» and, yes, you can indeed «see» many things with your own, first-hand, personal-observations, buuuuuuuuuut, reality is quite the much FULL of deceptions, for which I will eventually elaborate further.

②　Once a train is in motion, particularly if it is a mag-lev train, and, the motion persists, its passengers are also not going to be feeling themselves zooming or zipping at 1000 kilometres per hour without «trajectory» changes. Yes, yes, now you are likely to bring up in response that the atmosphere of the earth should be blown away and «sucked off into the vacuum of space» if outer-space even existed unless there was some sort of dome encapsulating all of the air/oxygen/gases/atmosphere/etc.; how-ever, what if outer-space is not really nor necessarily a «vacuum» but, also has some sort of «atmosphere» that moves along with earth's atmosphere in some sort of harmony ? Then there would be no need of a sealed dome encapsulating the earth (I will come back to Admiral Byrd and the running into invisible-walls stuff another time though as that is often used as part of Flat-Earth Theory as evidence of an earth-encapsulation). It has also been mentioned by some very meticulous-researchers that what are called the «Laws of Physics» do not necessarily seem to operate the same way in outer-space nor at every co-ordinate of the solar-system or galaxy or universe as what would be expected on earth... lending to the potential for more optical-illusions unless we can actually physically re-locate ourselves to those different vantage-points for personal-observations (although it is also a mis-nomer to call it a «Law» of physics for very good reasons that have been brought up by scientists like Dr. Rupert Sheldrake).

③　Having observed the skies myself a few times, one thing that I learned about observing the skies is that, a number of lights that exist up there, that would otherwise often be called stars, seem to move in rather peculiar-manners, definitely not stationary, but, kind of seemingly going in all sorts of different often apparently random directions, like an Orb of Light than just moves around at its own leisure (several of them for that matter). Like what am I even looking at ? And, I think you would be better off explaining here that, just because you see lights in the sky that appear to be round, does not necessarily mean that the object in the distance from which the light is being emitted is necessarily round, for example, one can see lights from an aero-plane in the distance at night, and, the lights coming from the aero-craft will certainly LOOK like it is round or spherical in shape, BUT, that does not necessarily mean that the winged craft or helicopter from which the lights are being emitted are spheres. And don't forget that «optical-illusions» exist for BOTH the «Globe-Earth» AND the «Flat-Earth» side of this very interesting Globe-versus-Plane psychological-phenomena.

Re : Amateur-Telescopes
And how do you know that these «amateur» (cheap) telescopes are not just displaying yet another «optical-illusion» that the «professional» (and thus much more powerful and elaborate and much more expensive) telescopes may be able to clear away and bypass ? I have looked (or tried to) at the moon in the past with a pair of binoculars that I had; can't say that I really saw anything that looked like what I would have expected or was hoping for though. How does it differ from looking at it with an amateur-telescope ? (Although even those are freaking damn expensive) What differences would there be looking at it with a «professional» telescope versus binoculars or an amateur-telescope ? Have YOU, yourself, PERSONALLY «field-tested» looking into these telescopes for yourself, BOTH of the «amateur» as WELL as the «professional» models on the levels of what exist at Hawai'i ?

Yes, everything could certainly be a simulation, even the data collected from Remote-Viewing could very well be an extremely elaborate «Plot-Twist» into our lives, and, you shouldn't just dogmatically hold onto ANY «beliefs» you may have adopted in life, regardless of whether it is Globe-Earth or even Flat-Earth, because ONCE you become «dogmatic» then it's pretty much OVER for both your intellectual and spiritual-growth; even Remote-Viewing needs to be questioned, for as much its protocols are indeed «scientific» (for at least a «scientific» as we've been able to get to thus far), you should ALWAYS look for the STRONGEST EVIDENCE /AGAINST/ what-ever you may «happen to believe in» at the time (thus, following the words of the very Messiah himself, who would still say : «Hypocrites ! First remove the beam/log out of your own eyes so that you may see clearly before trying to remove the sliver/speck of dust out of the eye of your neighbour/brother true who is only trying to help/assist you !»).

Thus far, regarding the STRONGEST evidence that suggests that the «data» collected from Remote-Viewers may be all deceptions, well, give it a watch/listen and decide for yourself as to its validity... https://rumble.com/v4i8gsw-remote-viewing-ebes-and-keyhole-novell-netware-sats.html

I also have more that I need to mention about «Reality Unlock» phenomena but not right now.

I'll read through all of AC's post shortly, but I'll just address this, which I think is *really* important...

"and use your senses."

Ok... let's talk about the 'senses'.

Can you see air? (not pollution, but the oxygen and nitrogen?) Can you see, feel, experience radio waves? Can you see your UAPs without the use of high-speed video (and, perhaps, IR cameras)?

"Trusting" our senses as being very good indicators of what's really out there is a very bad idea. The human senses are *very* limited compared to what is actually around us. The basic 5 pick up only about 5% of reality as we currently understand it. No radio waves, microwaves, IR, UV, etc etc etc. Hell, even our bodily sensation of touch is seriously limited on various parts of the body (compare fingertips to your back...). Our sense of temperature is pretty crap as well.

And, because "science" has used devices and technology that don't simply rely on these senses, humans have evolved technologically in leaps and bounds in the last couple of centuries.

So, which is more logical - trusting to senses which are shown to be incredibly limited (and often faulty... just think about your vision - the moon looks like it's the size of a 20c piece... but we know it's much, much bigger! The same with the sun (and, that's regardless of a scientific or FE version... look at that building I see outside - it's only 10cm tall... isn't it???)... or, trusting to the technology that has developed because of using better sensing and detection devices?