Just don't click on the link if you want to avoid spoilers.

Edit: Do you mean that I should post a link to the "reveal" after a week? Yes, I can do that.

I will try to do this regularly, but not here. I'm working on my own website where people can contribute their own targets and viewers can practice without being exposed to anything.

Thanks! Can you give us a link to your website to follow you there?

When it's ready. It's not a small project, and I don't want to make silly mistakes.

Don't worry this is NOT a Target-Reveal as I am just describing why I haven't started yet. That said, towards the end, I repeat some things mentioned by Aziz Brown.

Been intending to do this, but, due to annoying things I need to deal with, will not be able to get started until later towards this afternoon most-likely (the annoyance are what are known as Fungus-Gnats; I couldn't figure out where the hell these guys were coming from, but, I had a suspicion that they were growing out of the green-coloured portions of the Sphagnum-Moss of my Carnivorous-Plants since I had thoroughly cleaned the rest of this place of all possible other food-sources; they are easy to mistake as fruit-flies if you've never had any experience with them before which I haven't until now). Although it is a desperate-measure, I will be «fogging» my whole entire place later this morning, once I finish placing the rest of the drop-cloths over everything, and, I have a LOT of stuff around here that I need to be covering in those drop-sheets (been all paranoid about it as I don't want the fogger to corrode any of my electronics for which there are also a lot of around here and I spent several hours yesterday putting up a total of 8 or so drop-sheets over maybe close to half of everything that needs to be covered, and, before that, I even placed a whole bunch of gallon-bags and shredder-bags around various objects, electronics, devices, sensitive-items, etc.; may need to do that with all of the books since I don't want the books that I still need to sell to get «contaminated» either).

Anyway, I am certainly up for doing a «on-going» project, especially if it is something like in the manner of how Far-Sight ends up publishing those 2-3 hour long projects & reveals, finally, a truly comprehensive-project for all of us to participate in & hopefully (or at least Eventually) be able to get GOOD «Data» on par with the Far-Sight Team... that said, Aziz Brown has said so himself, that, Low-Level Data (e.g.: round, triangular, smooth, etc.) is almost always Correct, whilst High-Level Data (e.g.: Planes, Parachutes, Bridges, Roads, Buildings) is almost always Incorrect; Remote-Viewers describing «High-Level Data» instead of «Low-Level Data» was one of the things that Aziz Brown had mentioned as being one of the «mistakes» that new/amateur/etc. Remote-Viewers often make, so, be sure to include those instructions as a Tasker for those who don't know much Protocol.

We are all learning, myself included.

Regarding the gnats: Sounds to me like your plants began to grow their own food. 😉

Re : «Don't know what the black mass is, could be a moon.»
The high-level-description I gave of that was something of a Black-Hole. The low-level description would be some kind of pitch-black energetics in a spherical-shape. You wanted to go all the way towards the beginning of this universe as far as possible so my high-level explanation would be that, because Stephen Hawking lost a «bet» that he once made about the nature of Black-Holes, that, rather than being huge-masses of gravity that sucked everything into itself, Black-Holes are more like «information-leaks» that basically put stuff into the universe that isn't already in the Universe... that would make sense from a «this is how the universe started» perspective.

Re : «Interestingly, he didn't saw a pilot or captain in focus 2, but some sort of technology. This could mean that the ship was unmanned and flying on autopilot.»
Also keep in mind that this was only a one-pass session. Your Tasking also made the assumption that what-ever was in space had a Pilot; it's possible that the results could have been different if you described the Task/Target as a «manned» space-craft rather than just «the first spaceship ever built in this universe» and it's also still possible that I could have perceived some sort of Subject/Biologics with further/additional-passes (such as exploring the inside of Focus-One), but, considering that the structure(s) felt like a space inside of a printer, perhaps it was absent of any actual people/pilots/etc., also which would make sense because it's just safer to send out «probes» when «exploring the unknown» (and thus having something like the canary in the coal-mines) rather than personally going into uncharted territories for yourself...

Re : «To be honest, I didn't expect the data to be that accurate. I'm really impressed.»
I believe that I will be able to continue to improve upon accuracy upon learning more of the ASRV-Protocols so if you have any specific-instructions that allow me to learn what those protocols are & make use of them in future-taskings then by all means add those instructions so that I can work with something that is known to work & get good results so that I don't have to keep «guessing» at what I'm supposed to be doing in order to try to «Remote-View» targets...

Yes, I wanted a target billions of years ago, so it had to be a special event.

Regardless of whether the «Target» does not seem to require Accuracy, developing Habits for Higher-Level Accuracy with Good Low-Level Data is always preferable, especially since Blind-Protocol Remote-Viewing is done in just that manner... Blind ! And we already know that Space-Crafts exist & have existed (otherwise there wouldn't be all of those other Targets/Reveals/Projects that have shown the existence of all of those different aliens, extra-terrestrials, inter-stellar space-ships, levitation-craft, etc.).

It's therefore already a given that a craft will be seen; the «scouting» here would only really be in terms of whether said «space-craft» was «manned» by some sort of «pilot» or not;

And, also, keep in mind, that there were only two viewers for this project; if we had, say, a dozen or so other people viewing this target, and, all of us getting corroborating data, despite not knowing what each other are doing, then it would/should be possible to get more specific-details, such as the actual shape & structure of said «space-craft/ship/device/etc.» (and if it really does turn out to be an actual satellite, then, that also provides more information about adjusting the «wording» of the tasking to be more specific, such as «manned» space-craft or something more-specific).

Regarding your other thread on Protected Target, one thing that is already known about both Group-Meditation and Group-Prayers is that, when such things are done as a Group, the results end up being far more-effective than when done by oneself; that is not to say that one cannot be an outlier & accomplish on their own what would normally take a group to perform, but, just like any other «habits» formed, similarly to «swirling the energy» into an «automatic» habit/activity, its longer-duration makes the «automation» process more →→efficient←← & requires less «maintenance» energy/effort in order to maintain & upkeep

(metaphoric-references : when you swirl water around in a bucket or anywhere with a body of water, that water then starts to «flow» in the direction/manner that you are swirling it around; there are similar phenomena when it comes to the «Chi» or Ki or Prana or what the para-psychologists call Psi in English in the sense that being able to make use of & access said «Chi» becomes easier & more-efficient with frequent long-meditations; doing long-meditation sessions in any size-able group might be a challenge though simply because it won't be easy to find that many people in the populations with that much willingness nor patience to meditate for at least a whole entire two or even five or more hours in a row even though such a thing is likely to be able to «unlock» the ability to do what the «E.T.s» were «assisting Far-Sight» with in terms of that Epstein-Project; even as I type this, that is the «intuition» that I am getting, with different ways to describe it metaphorically, such as that piggy-back ride or two people moving a log instead of one person trying to drag it across a field or even like that in a scene out of a video-game or movie or animé scenario where there are two large buttons on the floor at different corners of the room or even located in entirely different rooms and, unless someone is standing on each button, the door simply doesn't open in order to be able to access the next room/stage/level/etc.).

"It's therefore already a given that a craft will be seen;"

I don't think so, because

1. the viewer's could be unable to look back billions of years (which I wanted to test), and
2. the target could be protected.

"when such things are done as a Group, the results end up being far more-effective than when done by oneself;"

I have no idea what that «Avatar» scene reference is about, but, for me it was already definitely a given that anything that may have happened even «billions» of years ago would be Remote-Viewable; consider the fact that they did a project on what really happened to the Dinosaurs to cause them to go extinct; Dinosaurs apparently really did actually exist, but, were also apparently co-existing with a different-version of «Reptilians» (perhaps of Lacerta's lineage) than the «Reptilians» who seem to be largely «controlling earth» right now; they revealed a very interesting & rather detailed «war» that apparently happened, resulting in that «Nuclear-Winter» that «wiped out the dinosaurs» because of an apparent «Genocide» that was going on which targeted this earth's inhabitants all those millions of years ago (and not due to any so-called «Natural» phenomena such as some sort of huge Asteroid piercing through the earth's atmosphere & creating world-covering dust-clouds).