Target: 6882-5717

Remote Viewing Practice Forum · 27 replies · 261 views · 6 followers

Pat McDonald

4 days ago

Here you go, didn't get that much data, but got what seemed appropriate.

https://1drv.ms/t/c/9339477ea80558d7/EQuA_DIzIEZLu3ut0zXCvQEBvPk6RqiURpmcSHYIJHGzyA?e=EYNBXr

Link to scanned handwritten and sketched originals (10 pages, last one is Gingerbread ideogram DMP, Second to last one is summary of data.)

https://1drv.ms/f/c/9339477ea80558d7/EuWJGYoxfo9Fm-IyRGhrnroB0uovwky5SP23hgImOJi5SA

It is customary for me to begin a formal transcript with the summary, that way a tasker knows if I'm completely off target or not.

Over to you Tazz. Try doing a Gingerbread? They're quite fun if you want to get data on a specific lifeform.

1 Like

Manuel

3 days ago

@Tazz

Do you want to give it a shot?

Tazz

2 days ago

If I take it, I wouldn't get a chance until tonight and it would still be haphazard. Plus a bit of AOL because I started peeking at the viewings.

I leave it up to you. If I can't do tonight I think you shouldn't wait any longer

Pat McDonald

2 days ago

Haphazard is my normal. :)

Try a gingerbread, it's a nice template to use for lifeforms. You can get odd data when the lifeform isn't human I will admit.

For instance, distinct lack of legs with some lifeforms. Also a bit tricky with ones that have multiple brains.

But they are quick, you just point at the bit of gingerbread person you want to get data from. Write down the data.

Tazz

2 days ago

Call my deadline Nov 7 00:00 UTC 😉

Manuel

2 days ago

"Plus a bit of AOL because I started peeking at the viewings"

This is the RV practice forum, so you can practice how to get rid of AOLs. 😉

Aéius Cercle

2 days ago

Adding AOL or Deduction or what-ever this should be called...:
I am suspicious that this Target is something to do with Harry Potter

Pat McDonald

2 days ago

Patience, we will find out soon enough.

Give Tazz time to live up to his word. No point rushing for answer.

Not sure how much of my ERV or DMP was AOL, that goes with attempting such things.

Manuel

1 day ago

If you ask me, AOLs are an important part of remote viewing. It's just how the mind works. For example, if you deduce a person to be a military guy because you see clothes that remind you of military, that would be an AOL. It's just pattern recognition. The important information at that point is: The person is wearing clothes that remind you of military. It should be said – just don't judge.

1 Like

Manuel

1 day ago

TARGET REVEAL

6882-5717

The viewer will perceive and describe the individual known as "Tank Man" in the moment he was standing in front of a column of Type 59 tanks leaving Tiananmen Square in Beijing on June 5, 1989.

Subject A: The individual publicly known as "Tank Man".

--------------------

The following picture wasn't part of the target, but that's who the famous Tank Man is:

Aéius Cercle

1 day ago

I'm not from the current time-line-configuration so I see very little resemblance to my Remote-Viewing Results to the Target; you _do_ realise you picked a «Mandela-Effect» target, right ? It's almost like our results were some kind of «over-lay» rather than the actual-target...

Edit/Addendum: I tried to find RichieFromBoston's old video talking about the Mandela-Effect, because, originally, Richie was certain & convinced that it was nothing more than some sort of Psy-Op, and, that things like «Time-Travel» and changing history was «impossible» until a few months later he made another video talking about how his mind was blown after he did more further-investigation (this did take «months» for him to realise that something was really off though). Even though he and ODD T.V. are on the «Flat-Earth» side of the «Truther» community, none-the-less, they have exposed a number of Psy-Ops over the years with very good evidence to make anybody with half a brain consider to «question» the «official-narrative» of events that are reported to happen on the so-called «news» outlets/channels. Alas, because of all of the censorship against him & people like him over the years since close to a decade ago, this was the closest I could find to any discussion involving him talking about the Mandela-Effect... https://mandelaeffects.co.uk/mandela-effect-richiefromboston-brian-s-staveley-breaking-the-phenomenon-down-huge-reality-shifts/

Manuel

1 day ago

If you can see different timelines with remote viewing, the Mandela effect shouldn't affect you negatively.

The mentor figure you saw was very interesting to me. I probed it a little bit and got the picture of a person standing before a window (which is the target) and another person blocking the window. But it's not a bad thing – you just need to understand who that mentor is before you can look out the window.

«Like a form of grounding (such as feet to ground) & re-connecting with nature?»

«What can such a thing accomplish ?»

«Comprehension of universe & control over nature»

Do you understand your own nature? Do you have self control?

Jon Smith

1 day ago

@Aeius

It's not so much a timeline as it is a time reset. That was part of the last time loop and we are in a new one. Those with a spirit can remember bits and pieces of the old timeline as the programming doesn't fully work on them, meanwhile those without spirit, NPCs/OPs, have no clue anything changed. This went also for our location in the milky way galaxy having moved closer to Orion as well as the location of the heart in the human body having moved compared to before. To those the programming fully works on they see no discernable reason to believe otherwise of what they see now, but to those the programming doesn't work on can remember the past timeline and current one and a conflict arises in their lower mind as to which is real and which one isn't.

Manuel

1 day ago

If it's the way you describe it, both timelines are real.

Pat McDonald

1 day ago

Well pal, if you want a list of target pools to practice your RV skills, then you can get plenty from the following link;-

https://www.reddit.com/r/remoteviewing/wiki/resources/targetpractice/

Training solo has advantages.

Jon Smith

1 day ago

In a way they would both be real, but what is real. It's what we make it to be. Belief systems here seem to dominate and even create our reality. As long as the majority of beings believe something is real so then it becomes that.

Pat McDonald

1 day ago

"TARGET REVEAL

6882-5717

The viewer will perceive and describe the individual known as "Tank Man" in the moment he was standing in front of a column of Type 59 tanks leaving Tiananmen Square in Beijing on June 5, 1989.

Subject A: The individual publicly known as "Tank Man"."

--------------------------------------------------------------

Tasking is a bit FUBAR. The road "Tank Man" is photographed on isn't part of Tianamen Square. That is about 200 meters away from the described RV space/time aperture that and the tanks had already left the Square at the time was captured by Associated Press photographer from a roof top.

The reason it is so grainy is because the full photograph includes Tianamen Square complete with piles of corpses, which obviously never get shown by the media. You have to pay for a copy of the full thing from AP and that is kind of tricky without going to France and seeing the archive people there.

Nope, I can't obviously put a licensed original out without breaking copyright rules, and that isn't what Farsight is about.

----------------------------------------------------------------

I haven't seen anyone task this event right yet, in 20 years of tasking tasks.

Thank YOU Manuel, I had a lot of fun with this, and I suspect the actual target was something different. If I was to point the finger anywhere, it would be the Monroe Institute. Who are my friends, and friends sometimes do crazy things for the love they have for their fellow man.

Oh, and Tazz.... Yer a WUSS! :) "I'll do a session"... nope. Failed to represent.

Which is pretty Australian of you, in terms of avoiding a somewhat contentious target. By being somewhere else.

Mature behaviour? Possibly. :)

Manuel

1 day ago

"The road "Tank Man" is photographed on isn't part of Tianamen Square."

The target doesn't allege that.

"The reason it is so grainy is because the full photograph includes Tianamen Square complete with piles of corpses"

"I suspect the actual target was something different."

It was not. My guess is you first focused on the surroundings, as you got quite a lot impressions of buildings and culture. When you did your gingerbread thingy, you described a man having issues with confidence, and "confident when doesn’t think". Looks like standing in front of these tanks was an emotional reaction, like a "f*ck it" moment.

"I haven't seen anyone task that right yet"

The target is just the individual standing in front of the tanks. What could be done better?

Pat McDonald

1 day ago

Corpse pile is to the right of your aperture.

It is striking how groups are sitting on the ground with evenly spaced guards standing over them. You did include those at least.

Pat McDonald

1 day ago

That's OK Manuel, I won't be needing a human tasker for a while. You are relieved of your duties as far as my RV quest goes.

EDIT: I don't mean, ever. I'm just rather exasperated right now. Gimme break.

For me this is a retask and I had a really crappy time in terms of emotional overload and hysteria the first time.

The aftermath in terms of relationships was epic bustup, I don't want to repeat that.

Manuel

1 day ago

So when you don't get what you expect, it's the taskers fault, and when you're asked what could be done better, you avoid that and walk away. Is that mature behaviour?

Pat McDonald

1 day ago

OK... in line with my policy on trying to be positive...

"It was not. My guess is you first focused on the surroundings, as you got quite a lot impressions of buildings and culture. "

That's because YOU included the phrase "Tianamen Square" as part of the locus aperture to RV at. Not my problem, YOU did that.

What you could have done is reference a street map of downtown Peijing and work out the correct Street name to use for the encounter. I make it Qlanmen East Road judging by the shadows and the Yandex map.

https://yandex.com/maps/10590/beijing/?ll=116.396298%2C39.897005&z=17.2

"Tank man" never actually made it to the Tianemen Square that morning, which I must admit looks rather in line with a lot of my impressions.

I changed my mind, I think I still had such a good time with your target, I will take more. :)

Honest Manuel. I had a blast and I don't care anymore about session data being right or wrong. It's just what I receive.

The tasker gets what the tasker asks for. That's how RV goes, and I've screwed up plenty of taskings myself. So fair play.

Manuel

1 day ago

I never said you were wrong.

"That's because YOU included the phrase "Tianamen Square" as part of the locus aperture to RV at."

And you decided to focus on it, just like you do now, even after the target has been revealed. But the target just states that the tanks were leaving Tianamen Square, and that's what they did.

I don't understand your problem.

Manuel

1 day ago

"For me this is a retask and I had a really crappy time in terms of emotional overload and hysteria the first time."

Oh, that could explain why you want to avoid the Tank Man and look at everything else. I'm okay with that. I didn't make this target to get what I want. I made it so people can practice.

1 Like

Pat McDonald

1 day ago

My problem is that I keep being sent back to experience something fucking horrible and there hasn't been a need to do that on either occasion.

The whole point of tasking is you set a limited aperture for the data you want, you DO NOT SEND THE VIEWER ON A WILD GOOSE TO CHASE AROUND THE SCENERY.

AFAIK the guy got suffocated with his own shopping bags. Quiet way to deal with the problem.

Then they ate his groceries, they were feeling a bit peckish after holding him down for a few minutes.

Manuel

1 day ago

"The whole point of tasking is you set a limited aperture for the data you want"

1. I did that. Look at the Tank Man in the moment he was standing there. The target doesn't expect you to wander around, or look at his death that may have happened afterwards.

2. The point of remote viewing is to see what's actually there, and that could be negative. If you don't agree to that, you shouldn't be remote viewing at all.