So, let's dive into why Moral Relativism is dangerous.

In the Inauguration thread, Jon, I mean EnkiTruth, quoted a text from the so called Ascension Glossary that explains what the term Anti-Christ means in the context of that glossary. I now want to talk about this snippet here:

"There is no enemy patterning in Guardian Host, Christos unity consciousness, however, when the anti-christ gestalts have agendas to torture and annihilate other species, they will protect and defend the consciousness if it is the choice that has been made by that being, such as the earth."

So, they will only help if the victim asks for help. This reminds me of how Courtney describes the ethics of the so called good ETs. In his words, they are "free will fanatics", and they won't help humanity as long as humanity doesn't make a free will choice to be helped.

In other words: They will only help when the victim wants it, not because it's right.

This is a clear sign of Moral Relativism, which states that every action shall be guided by what someone wants. In this worldview, a victim that is not choosing to be helped doesn't express a free will choice, so it can be ignored.

Do you get why this is dangerous?

A real good being would help even if the victim doesn't want it, based on the assessment wether the victim is able to understand its situation and wether it can make informed decisions or not. For example, a child that is sexually abused and doesn't understand why this is wrong is unable to call for help. Good people would help that child, because they know that the child doesn't know that it is a victim of a crime.

In the same way, most humans are unaware of the crimes they fall prey to. The whole prison planet, the death traps, the control system, the genetic and social engineering, the dumb down education – all this hassle is there to lower consciousness and prevent informed decisions. The whole purpose of the system is to make people not know that they are victims, and how they are abused – just like a child that doesn't know why sexual abuse is a crime.

Real good people would see that. They wouldn't wait until the victim gets that it's a victim all by itself. They would end the crime first, because it's necessary to restore the ability to make informed decisions.

Moral relativists who tell you that you chose to be a victim are pure evil. Nobody chooses to be a victim. It's a logical contradiction, because you are breaking the definition of what a victim is. Victimhood can never be chosen, because you can only become a victim involuntarily!

I already explained it with the example of slaves: A person who chooses to be a slave is not a slave at all, because a slave is someone who doesn't want to be owned by another. So if you choose to be a slave, you actually stop being a slave and become a wilful order follower. There is no word in human language I know of, the next best term is "household slave", or servant.

Whenever I see someone believe in Moral Relativism, I know that this person is either wilfully evil, or stupid.

Manuel, I understand your frustration. This idea about the ET's not intervening because of free will won't seem possible to us. My opinion is, they want a consensus here on earth to make a free will decision to follow a different path. Not one person, Trump, farsight, future forecasters, etc. are ever 100% accurate in predictions. Remember remote viewing is collecting puzzle pieces and trying to figure out the puzzle. They are never always perfect. Chaos after the election didn't occur. New York City underwater didn't happen, there was a project on farsight.org showing it. This isn't a negative comment directed at farsight, again not everything is 100% predictable.

I respect Courtney, but I still question everything he puts out and make sure it vibrates with me. For example, you're never going to convince me in all of eternity that if nothing happens in 6 months that the good ET's pack up their suitcases and take off, thus leaving us to the wolves. That just doesn't feel, vibrate, or logically make any sense. Situations change; timelines change. etc. If nothing does occur, Courtney not only has is reputation at stake but farsight. So are you supposed to hope chaos happens because if it doesn't good ET's take off? come on. I've been remote viewing for many years, fluent in out of body travel, have done all fo the monroe institue residential programs and have never heard that.

Trump. Everything Trump is planning is to prevent an all-out war. Regardless of whether or not you support him, that's neither here nor there. The point is, he's preventing WW3. I posted in a threat recently showing Don Trump Jr being interviewing Lue Elizondo and Ross Coulthart on ufo disclosure. I personally feel we will get disclosure. Let's be honest, that's what we are all here for! It doesn't matter if we agree with Courtney on death traps or his views based on his interpretation of his remote viewing projects. It doesn't matter if someone believes the Elena narrative or whoever. Disclosure is what we need and seek above all else at this point.

There are individuals that have real physical interactions. Courtney kind of scoffed at this in a spotlight. Doesn't matter it has happened, and i'm not referring to Dr. Greer. Ricardo Gonzales has had numerous physical interactions, one which well known ufo research Paolo Harris was at. Billy Meier another. Dr. Joe Dispenza has interactions at his retreats. None of these have been negative. More research needs to be done. individual projects on things like this, not Bashar. But i do understand, Bashar has a large following.

When I think of moral relativism, machiavellianism, or hell let's do away with the philosophy mumbo-jumbo. When I think of "sort of good" I try to imagine the context of something more realistic than these purist forms of reason.

Essentially: everyone has a foot to their neck. The good guys, the bad guys, the funny guys, the wtfs. The greedy controllers think "I must expand or die" the rebels think "I break rules because the rules are evil"

Harvey's group sounds like they're a faction of the federation hired to lay the groundwork to make for a cheap take-over. I don't want think they want to say it in these words but it's not that they don't want a war. They don't want an expensive war. They need us to do a lot of the work because as much as we might like to think we're loved and cherished and cared for and blabideeblablablaaa, at some point the thing is we're just not worth the expense. We have to incentivise our rescue.

Do I believe Farsight is "the saviour" with no deception at all? Absolutely not. Do I think Farsight is our best shot at freedom for now? Maybe. Though I don't have very much evidence to go by.

I definitely definitely definitely.... have more trust in someone that basically says "it's in my best interest to help you for now" way more than I would extend trust in someone saying: "I'll do anything for you"

"This idea about the ET's not intervening because of free will"

That's not the point. They are already intervening, their plan allegedly reaches back centuries. Or whoever they are, it doesn't matter, they are intervening. What is frustrating is HOW they are intervening. It tells me that they are moral relativists. Do they really believe that everything is a psy-op, even telling the truth?

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/71740-telling-the-truth-is-not-a-psy-op

It's getting ridiculous. At this point, I'm hoping it's Courtney's bias that is distorting the message. But there is so much more, as you say, it doesn't vibrate. So much that doesn't make sense if you take a closer look.

Maybe that's the whole point, so we can wake up to the nonsense. But when I look around, I don't see much people waking up. I see people buying into the fishy narratives instead. The aliens will save us. Trump will save us. Christ will save us. The light realms will save us. Remote viewing will save us.

It's all religion based on handing over the responsibility to others. Even the ETs do it by handing over the responsibility to us.

In my opinion, they have much more responsibility compared to us, because of the power differential. They have their memories, the knowledge, the technology, the support. What do we have?

And now they tell us we should wave at them, like, as if this is no war anymore. Why is it even possible that they can sit in the sky, playing the drone game? I thought this is a prison and the prison guards would shoot if the good guys appeared. Why are they not shot down? Have they already won? But if so, why aren't they telling us?

As I said, it's getting more and more ridiculous.