Too many projects are not using timelines, I find this frustrating. Many projects have multiple focuses, so is it beyond Farsight's wit to add a timeline as a final focus so we can get some vague indication of when events are likely to happen / did happen; i.e. Atlantis: Timeline when it was destroyed. Tanis: Timeline when it was destroyed. Lao Tzu: When was he actually alive. War in heaven: Timeline: When did it actually happen (We have vague ideas based on Lacerta files etc, but to corroborate with blind timelines on projects, and see if all viewers get the same would be very strong). This is a tasking problem, Its a 2 minute task, if that. I know time is one of the harder aspects of variations of RV to focus in on, but timelines are being used by several Farsight viewers in projects sporadically, so why aren't they specifically tasked when an event is historical or in the future??
I do make use of Time-Line-References when I «Task» Targets for Viewers.
One of the current targets contains the following wording...: «and will only perceive any original-version that has not be changed due to any form of Time-Distortion (such as the Mandela-Effect); The Remote-Viewer shall also accurately perceive the time when...»
Far-Sight people have themselves said that anything & everything they can do with Remote-Viewing, you can also do with Remote-Viewing, and, you are capable of even doing it better. I managed to get results that «Manuel» (forum-version) was «very impressed» with even though I did not really use much of the ASRV-Protocols during my session... that can be found here... https://www.quantum-note.com/Remote-Viewing/Session-Attempts/Target-Description(4192-8842.Tasker@Manuel)01.html
Good stuff. I'm a 5 year CRV vet and on an on target day, I'm up there with the best. My issue is that when the Farsight guys are not using timelines and then openly questioning when things happened in the breakdown with Courtney, it just seems stupid as its a standard phase 6 tool. If it isn't tasked, they should be doing one as standard anyway. Given they are doing targets I am not, I can't then do a target timeline as it is polluted by preconceptions of what I may already believe the time may be, or by what I've seen on their projects, you need to do everything blind. There are similar issues with Courtneys assertion of multiple timelines. If you are going to prevent something by doing something, the subconscious cannot view it - the tasking needs to be, for example from the recent projects "Which planned assassination attempts can be stopped by our viewing the plans of the attacker" Not "show us 2 assassination attempts" which Courtney then backtracks on. Given he is project manager he's actually quite slack. I understand workload and all, but he's frequently off protocol with things like this and given world class viewers are 50-70% accurate 60% of the time, or thereabouts there are far more misleading results than perhaps he should be stating. Like I said, timelines and correct task wording really could improve. Don;t get me wrong, I support Farisght and love what they do, but when I see Viewers not even numberign pages it makes me wince... There are too many non viewers here who may be taking everything on site as gospel.