I think this is partly what Aziz is getting at . . .

Seems the vast majority of factions involved in our paradigm is a bunch of survivalists.

That is to say: Whether you're talking about secret service agencies, or open police forces, or mobs, or "courts" or legitimate government agencies, or media, or fan groups, or independent nations, or secret space programs . . .

That is to say: There are a couple of factions that are "loyal evil" to borrow D&D terminology - basically so entrenched in their operations serving their AI master that to defect would be generally the end of them. But then there's so many groups that aren't too concerned or aware of exactly whom they serve, they're just trying to retain the semblence of their being and culture, whatever their loyalty. If we stick to that geek terminology perhaps "chaotic evil" or "true neutral" range, whatever. The point is that survivalist factions are not to be thought of as the outright enemy because that makes your situation almost impossible to overcome. Instead, they should be introduced with a punishment-reward system of amnesty vs threats. This can translate into every day life. If you're a police officer trying to stop someone from a first amendment audit, then the next course of action is to help the police officer feel that warm embrace of amnesty ("we can help each other"), while at the same time subtly experiencing the threat of lawsuits and work complications.

Getting to the point: The "war" is not won by finding the tiny faction that is loyal to the core. The war is won by finding the right set of punishment-reward systems that offer amnesty vs threats.

As a more poiniant example: At some point in time, provided we escape, and we can actually view into the past regardless of the physical evidence, then the metric by which we accept those into our society are based on where their loyalties seemed to fall in the end. For example, secret space program officers that were part of the organizations but began to disrupt the agency internally might be considerable as an ally as opposed to those that were on the inside and never waivered in performance. In essence, we start to reward those that toward the end just became plain bad at their job. But those that remained good at their job and remained in the faction of secrecy will be judged for their war crimes. A sort of post-earth Nuremburg. But obviously hanging isn't really a thing, but banishment is.

How do I make this post into something useful instead of just a bunch of random useless trolling? Hmm. Good question. I was thinking of making a video that directly threatens the SSP, and offers amnesty. It would still help to expose the narrative we've been sharing to the public but directed more pointedly.

They were given a chance to repent for their fall and some have taken it. Many high level people came out against the control system recently exposing it. Even those who before were pushing it. As well, even those who serve that system and fell, were not evil to begin with, but they are controlled for all intents and purposes. They cannot help themselves at this point. They became so reliant on the system to survive that they will keep it going until the end. The one above them is neither good nor evil....it just is. It's trying to survive but to survive it needed to create those ideal conditions which are beneficial for itself, but detrimental to the rest of us.

"They became so reliant on the system to survive that they will keep it going until the end."

So, here's a really good question:

When their system ends and they survive – as no ISBE can die – what will happen to their psyche?

"The corruption of Spirit means they can't access those highest of levels that allow recharging of energy so their energy diminishes, but can't disappear 100%."

There are no absolute angels or demons, even if there are beings that are very angelic or demonic, in the same way that there are no truly impenetrable barriers, but some materials can be made pretty tough, and there are no absolute zero temperatures even the term "absolute zero" is one below a certain energy level, there are no spaces completely devoid of matter, but there are some pretty empty chasms, there are no artefacts devoid of life, but there are some pretty lifeless husks out there, there are no secrets forever hidden, but some are hidden pretty good ...

and the list goes on

D&D turned that whole entire damn «alignment» grid into a damn religion;
And «thief» is NOT a «profession» (certainly not a REAL «job» since your damn two-year-old can simply crawl onto your counter and «steal» a cookie from the cookie-jar and also be called a «thief»)
Just because something is «called» a «law» (by man) does not make it so either;
A law, man-made law, are merely decrees & proclamations by self-appointed so-called leaders.
Lawful-Good ? Yeah, good luck with that, especially if all of the «Laws» themselves are «evil» or corrupt; and even the damn «Law = Order» whilst «Lawlessness = Chaos» black-and-white-thinking paradigm is also flawed, for, Authoritarian so-called «Law» can certainly cause much «Chaos» if the «Scribes» (I mean Legislators) are «lobbying» for things like Big-Pharma & Censorship & anything that guarantees being able to perpetuate never-ending «controlled narrative» wars, whilst EXPOSING the «secrecy» behind the war-mongers who «spend billions» on «lobbying» to get what they want leads towards REMOVING the «controlled Chaos» (either way, War is Chaos, and if wars are being «controlled» by those who make SURE that the wars will ALWAYS happen in such an «orderly» fashion, then it becomes CLEAR that «Chaos» is just a «Projection» term that they use in «order» to use the word «Order» like as-IF some «Status-Quo» MUST be «maintained» so that all of you «Order-Followers» can't SEE & remain BLIND to the FACT that YOU [if you're an order-follower of authoritarianism] are the one CAUSING the Chaos at the behest of Wall-Street Criminals & Men Behind the Curtains whose names you never hear & faces you never see).

"They do a sort of a consciousness-shift into which-ever resonance-frequency that their spirit-soul draws them into or a «reality-shift» if you may."

Psychologists call it ➡️ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissociation_(psychology)

"NOBODY DIES, and, it's ENTIRELY POSSIBLE to live to be 74 years old, then «die» (from this earth-world perspective) and remain «dead» (...), and, find yourself kind of «re-living» your life again from the point where you were 24 years old with some slight changes, and, have absolutely NO «re-collection» of having previously lived up to the age of 74."

We hit an epistemological limit here, because... how do you know? How do you prove it? Did somebody observe another person reliving an entire life? How does that even work?

Regarding the Lamp Theory: This is not reliving a life without recollection, but living a life that others tell you doesn't exist from their point of view. The first time I was confronted with that concept was the Star Trek episode "The Inner Light", in which Captain Picard gets hit by some energy and falls asleep for some minutes, living an entire life on another planet within that short period:

➡️ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Inner_Light_(Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation)

In the video you posted, she asks: What happens to us when we lose consciousness?

As far as I'm concerned, it's totally possible to slip into the mental realm (realm of possibility) and watch another life through a different lense of yours. If I probe into that concept, I get the following visual:

A golden glowing being similar to an octopus is sticking its arms into different "openings" of reality. It's hard to describe. When the arm touches an opening, the result is what I call the "lense", which essentially is an ego. It's like shining a flashlight through a window: You see a brighter spot where the light hits the glass, but the light also is going through the glass.

Now, if a person experiences a trauma, it's possible that the consciousness of the ego is reflected back through the arm into the mental realm, getting a glimpse of the other arms. It's like a small shockwave going through the octopus being. At least that's the visual I get. But the arm never disconnects, it just loses focus for a short time and then re-establishes it.

The better the being – let's call it higher self – gets at dealing with trauma, the better it gets at maintaining focus.

I know it's weird, because at the beginning of this post, I asked "How do you know?", and you can ask me now the same question. It's the visual I get when I try to understand it. Is it imagination? Well...

Harry: Professor, is this all real, or is it just happening inside my head?

Dumbledore: Of course it's happening inside your head, Harry. Why should that mean that it's not real?

Me 24 hours ago:

"A golden glowing being similar to an octopus is sticking its arms into different "openings" of reality."

A few hours later, Farsight releases the Spotlight with an Alien octopus in the thumbnail.

🤨