Enemies & War

General · 4 replies · 109 views · 3 followers

2 months ago

Having enemies precipitates war.
Having death traps presupposes someone, or something, attempting to control life.
A 'result' is determined by a 'cause', just as 'cause' can't exist without a 'result'.

Consciousness influences how reality is percieved.

What is consciousness?

Humanity may be standing at a 'threshold' of evolution that appears to be locked.
The ETs, as we understand them, may be 'poking their fingers through a key hole'

We see what (we think) we see because we 'interpret' reality based on conditioned experiences and thought patterns.

The only way that the underlying patterns (cycles of trauma) of the future can change is if we change the way we think about the present.

I am reminded of the tale of Baron Münchhausen and the conventionally 'fanciful' image of him rescuing himself and his horse by pulling himself out of a swamp by his own pony tail.

Good luck with that ♡

Manuel

2 months ago

"Having death traps presupposes someone, or something, attempting to control life."

It started with parents trying to control their kids.

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/71265-understanding-the-cause

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/71037-childhood-s-end

2 months ago

Thank you, I appreciate your response.

Without direct remembrance of past life experience, the 'death trap' is a useful way to interpret 'existential angst'.

At a phenomenological level the 'thought castles' we build to make meaning of inner and outer experiences have limited 'universality', unless someone else resonates with these 'ideas'.

The Farsight ideas about 'death traps' and 'Isbes' are an interesting interpretation of a (perhaps growing) awareness of an aspect of self that may trancend a single life experience.
There are other philosophical streams that try to define this experience within the bounds of their unique dogma. Given our current 'spiritual' limitations (as in non-physical perception), I see this as a totally acceptable meaning making strategy until one tries to force others to believe it.

There is a certain finality when you write, "No, even the death traps are just a symptom. The actual cause for turning the universe into hell is the idea to be an "archon", which is a ruler that "makes law"."

In my universe, belief, law and truth are not interchagable terms and the differences are not always obvious.

If one thinks that the universe has been turned into hell by an idea, there is hope that a different idea may offer less painful possibilities.

The hard road before humanity is paved with ideas about enemies and war. These ideas promise a painfully long journey to an end to cycles of violence that only benefit certain beings.

I assume that there are other possibilities if we acknowledge pain as part of life and the roles that fear and anxiety play in extending pain beyond its natural limits.

1 Like

Elemi

2 months ago

James DeMeo wrote a doctoral thesis about the origin of violence
http://saharasia.org/

Elemi

2 months ago

A good introduction in German can be found in: https://www.berndsenf.de/WiederentdeckungLebendigen.htm
free chapter 5 "Die historische Verschüttung des Lebendigen"
https://www.berndsenf.de/pdf/WDLKapitel5.pdf

or here:

and

1 Like

Manuel

about 2 months ago

"In my universe, belief, law and truth are not interchagable terms and the differences are not always obvious."

In my universe, a belief is the same as an axiom: An axiom, postulate, or assumption is a statement that is taken to be true, to serve as a premise or starting point for further reasoning and arguments.

Law is every universal, inherent, objective, non-man-made, eternal, and immutable condition which governs consequences.

Truth is that which is or has happened in the past.

"If one thinks that the universe has been turned into hell by an idea, there is hope that a different idea may offer less painful possibilities."

Hell is the logical result of living in opposition to natural law. It's the worst idea someone can have.