If the U.S. government were to enter into a treaty with extraterrestrials, say 50 years ago, and the terms involved receiving technology in exchange for genetic material and trafficked Americans, there would be several potential reasons why such an agreement could be considered non-binding. Here are 30 possible reasons:

1. Lack of Legal Authority: The U.S. government may not have had the legal authority to enter into such a treaty, especially without explicit approval from Congress.

2. Violation of U.S. Constitution: The agreement might violate constitutional protections, such as the prohibition of involuntary servitude (13th Amendment) or protections against unlawful detention (due process clauses).

3. Human Rights Violations: The trafficking of Americans and the use of genetic material could violate fundamental human rights, making the agreement invalid under international law.

4. No Consent: The people affected (trafficked individuals and those whose genetic material was used) likely did not give their consent, invalidating any agreement made in their name.

5. Lack of Transparency: If the terms of the agreement were kept secret or not fully disclosed to the public or to the government, it would undermine its legitimacy.

6. Impossibility of Enforcement: The U.S. government would have no way to enforce such an agreement, especially given the extraterrestrial nature of the other party.

7. Violation of Sovereignty: Allowing extraterrestrials to engage in such activities could be seen as a violation of the U.S. sovereignty, particularly if it involved control over citizens.

8. Ethical Issues: Many would argue that using humans as part of an exchange for technology is unethical, which could render the agreement void under ethical standards of international law.

9. Lack of Representation: The treaty may not have been negotiated by a legitimate or representative government, such as a treaty signed in secret by an individual without authority.

10. Conflict with National Interests: If the treaty conflicted with the broader national interests of the United States, it could be deemed invalid, especially if it was done without due process.

11. Unilateral Agreement: If only one party (like the executive branch) was involved in negotiating or agreeing to the terms, it could be invalid without congressional or public input.

12. Absence of Reciprocity: For a treaty to be binding, there must be a reciprocal benefit to both parties. The U.S. might not have received equal value in exchange for genetic material or trafficked citizens.

13. Extraterrestrial Legitimacy: If the extraterrestrial party was not a recognized sovereign entity (in the eyes of Earthly law), their "treaty" might not hold any legal weight.

14. Breach of Contract: If the extraterrestrials failed to live up to their end of the agreement (e.g., delivering technology), the treaty could be considered breached and non-binding.

15. Intervening Legislation: New laws or amendments to U.S. law (such as anti-human trafficking laws) could retroactively invalidate the agreement.

16. International Law: Under international treaties and conventions (like the UN Declaration of Human Rights), the U.S. may be forbidden from entering agreements that violate basic human rights.

17. Unconscionability: The terms of the agreement might be deemed unconscionable, meaning that they are so unfair to one party (the U.S. population) that they should not be enforced.

18. Invalid Subject Matter: The subject matter of the agreement (e.g., trafficking humans and taking genetic material) could be considered illegal or unethical, rendering it void.

19. Fraud: If the agreement was based on fraudulent representations (such as false promises from the extraterrestrials), it could be declared void.

20. Governmental Corruption: If government officials acted in bad faith, accepting the terms under duress, manipulation, or personal gain, the agreement might be invalid.

21. Lack of Consideration: In legal terms, a contract or treaty must involve "consideration" – a mutual exchange of value. If the technology offered by the extraterrestrials wasn't a fair exchange for the genetic material or trafficked humans, the treaty might not stand.

22. Time Barred: Over the 50 years since the agreement, new political leaders or changing legal frameworks might render the original agreement obsolete or unenforceable.

23. Breach of Trust: The betrayal of citizens' trust, particularly in a government that is supposed to protect them, could invalidate the agreement.

24. Public Opposition: If the public was unaware of or opposed to the treaty, it could be argued that the agreement lacked the consent of the governed, which is a foundational element of legitimacy.

25. National Security Threats: If the treaty jeopardized national security (e.g., through secret exchange of sensitive technology), it could be invalidated by national security laws.

26. Change in National Policy: A shift in national policy—such as a decision to no longer tolerate or engage with extraterrestrial parties—could invalidate prior agreements.

27. Unlawful Extraction of Resources: If the genetic material or individuals were extracted or trafficked unlawfully, this could invalidate the treaty under human rights and criminal law.

28. Lack of Due Process: If the U.S. citizens whose genetic material or lives were traded were not afforded due process, the agreement might not stand under U.S. law.

29. Absence of Diplomatic Recognition: If extraterrestrials were not recognized by any Earth government as legitimate diplomatic entities, their agreements would have no legal weight.

30. Change in Jurisdiction: If a new international body (such as the United Nations) or extraterrestrial body were to assert authority over such treaties, it could potentially void the agreement.

In short, there are numerous legal, ethical, and political considerations that would challenge the validity of such a treaty, from violations of human rights to the lack of consent, authority, or proper diplomatic processes.

You're forgetting one thing.

The fallen don't care about universal laws. They have been intentionally breaking it for a very long time now. This whole "treaty" with the US was only part of the script for the random sheep to think they're still free instead of realizing they're stuck within the prison planet. As long as they think as a group, instead of individually, they would never be able to leave the game due to attachments.