I think there's this mental zone and I don't really know if there's yet a common name for it. Intuition would not be quite the right word. I might call it "Millieu" viewing.
So it's like this. You have a couple different categories of mental . . . let's say . . . engagement.
You have imagination. And anyone can argue that anything imagined is actually happening somewhere but what I mean is your brain basically creates a strategy or a hypothetical scenario by cutting and pasting elements it's familiar with into a scenario. Imagining different chess moves, or imagining phrases you might say in a response to a pre-empted conversation, whatever. This happens very normally, and can be expressed any time. Whether it relates to a psychic link, it could very well be, but it's hard to use this as directly applicable data because it can easily be a mix of cut-and-paste from your immediate or recent environment or strong memories vs a psychic link. You do this any time you draw or write or just speak hypothetically.
So then you have direct observation. This is the passive use of evidence without any judgment. Even remote viewing has an element of direct observation when you hear someone's input and you just take in what's being said. But this one I'm talking about primary senses. And of course that includes use of primary senses on other scientific instruments. Looking at a rock, or looking at a seismograph with your eyes, 2 examples. Another prime example of this might be when you're driving, and responding to the events on the road. There really isn't a lot of imagining you want to be doing while driving, and although again this might be using some psychic ability as in pre-empting the actions of other vehicles and events ("peering in the future") , you are still relying on what's directly in the rear-view mirror, the windshield, etc
Now you have remote viewing. That's still like passive observation, because you're not really trying to cast any judgment on the events being presented, you're just trying to sponge off of what your psychic mind is picking up. But it's different from the conventional sense of observation because your natural 5 senses are not heavily at work, in fact you're trying to avoid them in general, (still you're using examples of what those senses can pick up to reference what your psychic mind sees of course)
Ok so there's this other thing. And I would say it comes a lot with science fiction writers or comic writers, or artists. They're not doing quite remote viewing but they're not quite imagining just for its own sake. It helps us open our mind about possibilities, but it also likely picks up things that have to do with our pre-life memories or events about to happening or actually happening as we create the whatever art form. The Farsight exploration with George Lucas put this idea in the forefront. Let me cut to where I'm going with this.
I have often liked millieus. This is stories that are based on a very elaborate realm or made up universe. Stories of Star Trek or Star Wars or The Hobbit or Dune are all examples. Some more elaborate than others. But the millieu seems to have a goal in making you explore a bit of this world rather than just tell a specific story. I have often wanted to create millieus, but the thing is I am rarely motivated to actually try to make a story *of* the millieu. I just want to tell you about the world. Another kind of work of fiction that goes deep into this idea is with paper role playing games. They don't bother to create a story themselves, or they don't need to in the publication. They are setting up a system and a world or situation in which your use of their system creates the story. But what if you don't even feel motivated to make some sort of system with dice and cards and combat systems etc. You're, again, just wanting to describe this elaborate world. I've often read some of these rule books simply because I wanted to understand their world, and I never really did bother to play the game (some of them I did)
So here's what I'm asking. Is it possible that a lot of possible remote viewing data is getting missed from the public by simply not enough fostering and encouraging of these millieus, these works of "fiction" that need no plot, no storyline, no system guiding it? They don't have to be taken at face value as fact, but they can be looked on with some enjoyment, and intrigue at the probability that the person writing the millieu is very likely tuning into something relevant to our current needs. It seems, especially when someone wants to write about a world or idea and they're not even that interested in what money it might make them, but just the sheer creation, maybe their subspace mind is picking up something that needs to be known.
Birdie Jowarsky and her TDM is making me thinking about this more seriously because she kind of encourages the engagement of not rejecting anything, just trying to see it further and further.
Wouldn't it be interesting if you had a 100 or so people all asked to just write about imaginary things they feel like writing. And you asked them to upload it near simultaneously so that they can't really review each other's work, and if some of those submissions happened to be *so* similar, and yet not seem based on anything related at all in the mainstream media. (So you can't argue that they just got it off a popular movie at the time or something). Would they have some useful information coming up in the collective imagination?
Or if amongst this group of imaginers, many come up with a reference to one book or movie or scene that isn't normally very popular, and it makes one wonder why this excerpt or publication was prevalent enough to show up amongst several imaginers simultaneously. Can people work as a battery for remote viewing data even if they've never practiced remote viewing at all? They are the "AI" of the collective unconscious.
Are remote viewing teams really just concentrated imaginers, getting hard data because of their training and because the tasker can sift the information carefully, but even a whole bunch of "imaginers" can still come up with psychic data because a "tasker" of the imagined information can still sift through the data to collect things that are clearly more than coincidence.
In fact . . . is that not possibly what the powers-that-be could be motivated with when they buy and sell online tracking of information and people's online activity. Not just because they are trying to track everything we are doing and our habits for commerce and control, but they can use trends and expressions as psychic phenomena, using the collective subconscious of the masses to crunch data and tell them things that the people as individuals would have no clue they're picking up, but together are churning out strong prophetic realizations etc.
I know this is not a new topic, these things were being discussed in Institute of Noetic Sciences and the once Princeton Engineering Anomalous Research amongst others, but it's all being suppressed so I don't really care if it gets repeated.
I guess the place where you can apply this is if people are encouraged to express their "imagined" worlds more often, like children do, maybe there is data to be had. I was exploring this a bit with a thread here "I remember an entire civilization" or something like that, which I'll probably bump later, but in one of the recent Farsight Board Meetings the ETs were saying something to the effect that they're telling us things and we're shying away too much from expressing what we're being told. I cringe at what kind of stuff we might get bombarded with if people were to suddenly post all about whatever they're imagining constantly. But maybe the fact that you "like" the imagined thing that you want to talk about is enough to suggest that it has a high relevance to our needs in the current time. Perhaps "RV" forums can start to look a bit like a Deviant Art site (PS I do look at places like Deviant Art for this reason). Just a whole bunch of imagined things being compiled, because they are possibly speaking to a hidden reality that is waiting to get deciphered.
Well perhaps this was a waste of your time but I felt like writing it.