Starting around 28:30, Clif High talks about Courtney and Harvey.

https://clifhigh.substack.com/p/notification-from-universe

What do you think of his opinion?

He claims what Farsight is doing with the board meetings is channeling.

Courtney claims it's telepathy, not channeling.

The important question is: Is the difference significant?

The theory is that when channeling, you are handing your body over to another entity, thus attracting entitities who are not free will beings and therefore are not good. In contrast, with telepathy, you keep your bodily autonomy.

But telepathy doesn't solve all the problems, because the other person could still be a liar. How can you tell telepathically wether someone is not lying? Is that even possible?

This brings me to something I was thinking about the other day that circulated the new age community,

Diviners of sorts suggest that you never pursue spiritual knowledge unless you insist on " of100% pure white light" or "of only the utmost high" or "only from the divine angelic beings"

Now picture this. You're broke and starving on the side of the road. People offer you money and you say: "i'm sorry mr donor but I'm going to insist that nobody gives me money unless the donor is 100% pure white light divine being holy of holies angelic dinosaur riding lazer-shooting demigod"

Yeah good luck with that. Now you can almost be sure that anyone continuing to offer you money after that sentence is probably out to traffick you.

Cliff can say what he wants - in any way he wants.
Do I believe what he says all the time - No.

Judging the character of an ET is no different from dealing with people in daily life. You come to know a person's true character by observing their ACTIONS over a long period of time.

This issue with the Harvey scenario is, the experience is limited and the stakes are high.

Seeing is believing. If nothing comes from the Harvey conversations then it would be alarming for farsight members. I find it peculiar that other people on the planet are having real contact that has been verifiable but Harvey needs to remain cloaked. Ricardo Gonzales has been taking hundreds of people into the mountains where even famed researcher Paola Harris has described her experience. Ricardo’s interaction seems to point toward a different type of beings. There are others as well. Dr Joe Dispenza has been averaging over 2,500 attendees to his week long retreats, where different 10ft tall plus light beings have been showing up and assisting in his coherence healings of individuals with miraculous results. None of these examples seems to be concerned with reptilians or negative ETs. So time will tell what happens next. We have election, we have problems in geopolitics. We as a species have to chose how we move forward.

Daz Smith handed out a Harvey target at one of his community RV calls and they got back someone standing there. Other people here can sense them even through the video.

I think the Harvey thing doesn't pass most people's analytical overlay fitler - you want to rush to judgement on it without getting the sensory data and unless you're practiced at doing that you'll analyze away the data that's there. I don't blame Cliff even if he's talking out of his ass - it's a big ask to "believe" this if you can't confirm it from sensory data. Cliff isn't in the same group as Michael Salla, Elena Danaan, J.P. and Bashar who want to mislead on purpose.

Mostly it doesn't matter. We're a few months out from big changes

I think most people on here don’t disagree Harvey exist. It’s whether or not what he says is true and will or won’t happen. By nature, humans want to believe and we’ve been led to believe for so long it’s a waiting game. But, if you look at the information Harvey gives, it’s nothing new from the last few years. It’s redundant of the farsight projects, which is fine. There isn’t detail, maybe that’s how it’s supposed to be. Maybe the farsight team knows a little more behind closed doors. Courtney asked Harvey about politics, the response “it’s too complicated”. Yes we’ve heard over and over the death traps. Also, “The good ETs have guns at the heads of bad ETs”. That statement could mean a lot. But, how do you lose if that’s the case? So in theory we should win. “Do you want a shooting war? Do you know what means?” Yes, Harvey if we have a chance at losing the war that you “think” we will win but lose then yes. Because, at that point what the hell do we have to lose?

Clif High's work is interesting but he tends to be very black & white and dismissive with his viewpoints. His criticism of Farsight's experiences with Harvey is like throwing out the baby with the bathwater. I think most people who are into RV can acknowledge that Farsight has done great work and its RVers are some of the best on the planet. With Harvey, I'm keeping an open mind.

In the Clif High video that I posted, Clif talks about how the Rogan-Trump interview is a temporal marker for the disclosure of ETs. The interview has now occurred (posted below) and around the 2:45:00 mark, Trump brings up the subject of ETs and hints at disclosure.

@Amara
I wish Joe Rogan would have let Trump speak without interruption about the UfO's and off planet life. Seems to me Trump would have said more, and was trying to, but couldn't. Opportunity lost.

Who-ever is on Telegram and can or is willing to join the following Law-Related Channel...
https://t.me/sovereigntyinternational
...recently, one audio-file, displayed as 1_4958569417161049365.ogg in the message-history, was shared wherein the audio-clip has someone talking about various things related to the U.S. Military and Operations for «Smoke-Out» (forcing the creatures out of the Under-Ground Tunnels & D.U.M.B.s) and Alien-Disclosure, but, somewhere within the mid-portion of his speech, the man also made mention of the GFW or Galactic-Federation or what-ever it's called... either way, much information was described, regarding potentially «disruptive military operations» which sound like a bunch of really great remote-viewing targets to pursue, should anybody be interested in listening to the audio & finding out just how much of the guy says matches with the actual reality of the «complicated» world-situation...