Amongst a number of some of the more-recent video-releases over the last month or two, Dr. Courtney Brown has mentioned that DNA has a great deal of effect upon dictating, controlling, deciding, influencing (heavily) one's beliefs, political-leanings & that these findings are not even controversial.

I wanted to dig further into this, for some reason, and, whilst looking up these studies, that support these claims, a question «popped» into my mind, with the «LGBTQ+ABC.XYZ/etc.» movement, and, various people who complain about a «woke» agenda being pushed, I couldn't help but to wonder if any of these things were/are related for some reason; I do not believe that DNA changes or is altered «randomly» but requires conscious-intention, although it is known that DNA can be changed (and creatures can actually be genetically engineered), a «biological-robot» that is described elsewhere on these forums as the «organic-portals» (same thing basically), without any souls/spirits/etc., that begs a variety of questions as to whether DNA over-rides consciousness, beliefs, tendencies, behaviours, soul, spirit, etc., the other way around, what can change the DNA, etc. ? (I guess I can look-up next what can change/alter biological-DNA later after this thread gets posted)

Disclaimer : I had some assistance from Co-Pilot in order to obtain its following information...

BBC Article: This article discusses the growing body of evidence suggesting that political views could be influenced by our genes. The idea that political views have a genetic component is now widely accepted enough to become a field of study with its own name: genopolitics. This began with a pivotal study, which showed that identical twins shared more similar political opinions than fraternal twins.

Pew Research Center Study: Using data collected from a large sample of fraternal and identical twins, a research team found that genes likely explain as much as half of why people are liberal or conservative, see the world as a dangerous place, hold egalitarian values or embrace hard-core authoritarian views.

Political Analysis Journal Article: This article offers a new explanation for the results of twin studies in political science that supposedly disclose a genetic basis for political traits.

Massive Science Article: Numerous papers have used twin studies to assess political party affiliations, attitudes and inclinations. Many of them have suggested that genetic factors play a role in how political ideologies are formed.

Co-Pilot then concluded : These studies suggest that while our genes may influence our political beliefs, they do not determine them entirely. Our upbringing, personal experiences, and social influences also play significant roles. It’s important to note that these studies are based on statistical correlations and do not establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship between specific genes and political beliefs.

Sources referenced...
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20121204-is-politics-really-in-our-genes
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2013/12/09/study-on-twins-suggests-our-political-beliefs-may-be-hard-wired/
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-analysis/article/abs/genes-and-politics-a-new-explanation-and-evaluation-of-twin-study-results-and-association-studies-in-political-science/7F2F1CB976B7DD2D89CC254802C09659
https://massivesci.com/articles/genopolitics-heritability-twin-studies-francis-galton-eugenics/

Ultimately, though, the question I felt compelled to posit here, was in regards as to whether people would use this information as an «excuse» to go about engaging in anti-social-behaviour, with the «rationalisation» that «it's in my DNA» (something similar to : the Devil made me do it), although on the other hand, people who are prone to DNA dictating their actions/behaviours/beliefs, are probably the the external-influence type (forgot if this was the Type I or Type II Personality Trait), who would not believe in things like this anyway, even if DNA is ironically scrambling their brain's logic-circuits/etc.

well i believe Yemmé had this on her session about creating new memories of themselves,
https://www.farsightprime.com/ufo-fleet-over-pensacola
also you the vaxx's, as Bill Gates himself said it " there are lipid nano particles in the vax that assemble themselves with one another"... Dra Ana Mihalcea has showed several times that these aerogels in the dna assemble themselves through frequencies, wi-fi and so on.
Has someone said it on Tucker Carlson interview, it's the hijack of the mind.
This is almost no different than having parasites in the body that influence the nervous system, anxiety, fear base belief system that although they are part of the genetic blueprint (meaning it's programmable) it's energetic charged can be influence by these life forms that many MD are now starting to understand that it is responsible for several disease in the body and many people are having almost like a transcendental experience after detox specially kids with autism symptoms and adhd.
Also if you take into consideration the work for example, of Dr. Joe Dispenza and his research (i've mentioned this several times) you will that the work is based on a process of changing the genetic blueprint of someone by changing their belief systems/emotional charged, according to their papers the cells are constantly changing their information based on epigenetics and base on a quantum field perspective.
Also another work made in Harvard where they put seniors living for several months in a place that was all decorated like it was in their 20's, the study showed those seniors reverse bone density structure, the color of their hair, the amount of hair they had, their joints started to become more adaptive to exercise, basically they "reverse" their age.

"This is almost no different than having parasites in the body that influence the nervous system"

There's a Star Trek Next Generation episode, the last of the second season, called Shades Of Gray. It's one of the weaker episodes, but the plot has more to it than it seems:

➡️ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shades_of_Gray_(Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation)

"During a geological survey on Surata IV, Commander William Riker is struck by a thorn growing on a motile vine plant. The away team immediately beams back to the Enterprise, where Dr. Katherine Pulaski finds out that the thorn has released a deadly virus into Riker's body. Within a matter of hours, the virus will reach Riker's brain, killing him."

Interestingly, that virus is connecting to the nervous system on a molecular level, making it impossible to kill the virus without harming Riker.

"To try to save Riker's life, Pulaski puts him into a machine that will artificially stimulate his brain neurons, keeping them active and resisting the virus. [...] However, while pleasing to Riker's mind, the passionate dreams only worsen Riker's condition, as the virus feeds on the positive endorphins his brain is creating. Pulaski and Counselor Deanna Troi therefore agree to try to make the machine evoke negative dreams instead. [...] Seeing that the raw emotions work best, Pulaski intensifies the dreams to come at a more rapid pace. This finally kills the virus and Riker recovers."

What's so interesting about this episode is that it doesn't follow the narrative of positivity healing you. Instead, it's the so called negative experiences that save him, as all these experiences contributed to his emotional resilience against attacks. The negative experiences, the battle with the shadow, made him strong, not weak.

oh man..
"What's so interesting about this episode is that it doesn't follow the narrative of positivity healing you. Instead, it's the so called negative experiences that save him, as all these experiences contributed to his emotional resilience against attacks. The negative experiences, the battle with the shadow, made him strong, not weak."

i was thinking about this before reading your view on it.
This is exactly what we've been talking about here for the last 2 years, how the new age spiritual community is being deceived "to some degree" with some of the messages of the channeling community, to reject some notions and discoveries due to it's negative charged is to reject the all truth...
I going to check on that episode.

"to reject some notions and discoveries due to it's negative charged is to reject the all truth..."

Yes. Negative experience can lead to positive outcome. For example, healing childhood trauma is not a fun thing to do, but the result is positive. The new age movement is working against that healing capacities of humans.