In the Insectoids project, the "good" ETs had one thing in common: They are not aggressive, meaning they don't enslave other beings. That's why they don't like the invasion of the brain called "deep mind probe" – because it's an aggressive behavior that is disrespecting self-ownership.

I think it's time to develop a protocol on how to contact and deal with other beings in a good way. There was very helpful information in that project, so here's my suggestion:

1. Read the "frequency" of the being. You can tell wether it wants to protect itself or not.

2. No trespassing! Just knock at the door like a civilized being.

3. Start a conversation, ask wether the being wants to give its information voluntarily. There were great conversations with the good ETs in the Insectoids project. That's how it's supposed to be.

4. Beings who already expressed aggressive behavior, like the Draco reptilians, have no right to self-ownership, as they are also disrespecting that right regarding others.

But keep in mind that within natural law, there is no such thing as kin liability or guilt by association. It's always the individual that is responsible. For example, an encounter with a Draco justifies the assumption that it will be aggressive, as most of their kind expressed aggressive behavior and conviction in the past. But it's also intelligent and has free will.

So, how do we deal with potential aggressive beings while at the same time respecting free will?

A good example are the Insectoids that are involved in the human trafficking. The remote viewers asked them why they do it, and the answer was "that's how things are" or something along those lines. Because of that answer you can tell that that individual will not respect self-ownership. It's a predator. Predators don't have the rights which they are violating. It will be okay to go into their brain, because that being would do the same.

Hi Manuel, a short comment on your last paragraph that I will copy here:
"A good example are the Insectoids that are involved in the human trafficking. The remote viewers asked them why they do it, and the answer was "that's how things are" or something along those lines. Because of that answer you can tell that that individual will not respect self-ownership. It's a predator. Predators don't have the rights which they are violating. It will be okay to go into their brain, because that being would do the same."
If you ask a (human) farmer why he farms his animals he could very well answer: 'that's how things are'. The farmer does not respect self ownership byu the animal. He's a predator. He doesn't have the rights that he is violating..... etc.
You get the point?
Things are not so easy. Not so black and white.

Hmm. Or a procedure sort of like this,

1. Arrive at target subject, or subject of interest
2. "Friend or foe" mind probe. Friend means they aren't necessarily looking to aid humanity, but they resist all participation in the enslavement of others. Foe meaning they actively enslave and/or collaborate heavily with those that do.
3a. "friend" response prompts sending a request to Deep Mind Probe.
3b. "foe" response prompts an aggressive deep mind probe (we are at war and in desparate need afterall)

It a hard knowing how to act in these circumstances, like Yemmé said, on one hand these dmp's can be evasive on other hand they do and have been doing it to humanity long since we exist, not to mentioned the fact we are an enslaved population trying to get free from these chains.
I remember that project "UFO Fleet Over Pensacola " where Yemme had an encounter with another enslaved being working for the oppressive, her interaction with him was to some degree respectful (we discussed this already), she delve into dmp him in order to get the information out by her means with his consent, this way the being would not have problems with the reps.
I don't thing there is a good way to go about this, or even a free will way about it when you as an enslaved isbe is trying to get information from oppressive groups, which leads me to the thought that someone will have to do the dirty job for "the greater good".
It's a slippery slope, however i do also agree with discussion about how to proceed in a more "meaningful" manner with these beings but in the end of the day not only it is about freeing ourselves from these oppressive and these isbe's that work for them, but also it is the remote viewers choice on how they'll interact with them.

"If you ask a (human) farmer why he farms his animals he could very well answer: 'that's how things are'. The farmer does not respect self ownership byu the animal. He's a predator. He doesn't have the rights that he is violating..... etc.
You get the point?
Things are not so easy. Not so black and white."

Well, they are. That's why humanity is confined on a prison planet: The predominant conviction within humanity is that humans have the right to own other beings despite their individual nature, meaning those beings are capable of moving freely by nature. You either have an instinct to own other beings, or you have a conviction that you have the right to own other beings. In both cases, it makes you a predator.

The belief that humans have the right to own other beings attracted other predators who treat us like cattle. Because that belief created government that can be manipulated by other predatory species easily.

If we want to get rid of the predators who govern our governments, we must stop being predators ourselves. That would lead to us not having governments anymore that can be manipulated. The prison planet would become ungovernable.