why don't we hear about any Farsight RV tagert misses? are we to believe the RVers are 100% on-target?

while i obviously support FS, as i'm a subscriber, i'm dubious about anything close to a 100% success rate, with respect to RV. the best & most accurate remote viewers ever known, are off-target, by a significant percentage, overall.

in joe mcmoneagle's book, "the ultimate time machine", on page 3 of chapter 1, he states [in reference to project stargate]:

"we viewed a remote viewing success rate of 60% as pretty remarkable."

ingo swann, the "father or remote viewing", had a 65% success rate, during the time he met with axlerod, and rv'd the moon. everyone should understand that even ingo, was off-target 35% of the time.

so why isn't Farsight clear about how often their viewers are off-target? what does Farsight [Courtney] do, when a viewer is off-target? does he keep re-tasking them, until they are? is there any frontloading, whatsoever, when a viewer needs to be retasked? has Farsight ever omitted a remote viewer’s target assessment, because it was obviously off-target?

Courtney, if you read this, please explain why Farsight doesn't disclose RV misses. Your paying subscribers deserve to know the truth of both RV hits & misses. In fact, your data would be considered more reliable, by most people with discernment, if we knew when the viewers were off-target. I haven't seen this from FS, for as long as I can remember...

respectfully,
phoenix

Our approach is different in many respects. One key is that we only record low-level data. It is our approach. Anything high-level is deducted. Low-level data are almost always correct. High-level data are almost always incorrect. We build our sessions as large collections of low-level data.

Ah well, judgement of "success" is more of a political exercise when it comes to human group activities.

Rather than descend into examples of politics, I'll just say Farsight aren't really aiming for complete objectivity at all levels. Rather they are aiming for a grassroots "we know the answer is in this area roughly" approach.

Other RV old timers are claiming far, far more strongly. And no, I'm not giving examples which might cause further rumpus.

I certainly don't take everything said in a Farsight production as being completely and utterly accurate. But I'm still here.