Would it be honestly possible to do a series or topic relating to our Earth's history events in a way that you could remote view an event, let's say..."What if President Kennedy had not been assassinated and lived How would the world have changed, and the US?" Divergent possible futures? Or if Hitler (fates forbid) actually HAD won the Second World War? Or...If "Roswell" had not been covered up? The Dinosaurs didn't get wiped out and lived? There is so much to go with here but CAN remote viewing actually do that or has it been attempted? I'm rather curious if that would be possible...only a thought if it is even worth it to do so?

I think it should be possible, but, with the limitations of the human-versions of consciousness & perceptions, I also think there would be limitations as to what kind of information would/could be obtained. Probably your best bet would be to follow «time-travellers» who have «time-travelled» from the future or at least made such claims in order to warn current-time-line populations of future-catastrophic-events. Then there are the phenomena of the Mandela-Effect that probably needs to be looked into if not already...

Courtney did something like that with The Death Traps where created a target to see how and what would happen if there weren't any death traps.

Artur, I recalled Courtney using it at one point I just couldn't remember where or when...Thanks. I hope they dabble with it in their upcoming projects.

Laura, the answer is 'yes' - with a huge caveat... like most things to do with the future, it tends to depend on which version.

I am aware of this because there have been a number of RVers who have spoken of it. As well as those who use RV for predictions, and what they have to say about the topic. One example is the current "World shattering event" that the FutureForecastingGroup was hit with a couple of months ago.

All it takes is a well-defined tasking cue.

Of course, by strict definition, it's not Remote Viewing, because there's no way to verify or validate it (ie, no true feedback). But, it's effectively the same thing.

You could do it yourself if you put in the time and effort to learn RV.

Shoningbow, it would be a dream of mine to be able to remote view, I just think attempting to learn it now when 57 yes old might be a challenge with some health issues and slower response reflex times. I’ve been to the free online live sessions they offer here at FARSIGHT and tune in to everything they offer and create and it is invaluable ,follow along the classes, but hard to go so fast at this point. I do intend to continue trying it I just think my age now is a factor. I do have inherent Oracular ability and meditation practice in my past. I strive to learn it time constraints and other interferences come up. But I totally agree with your input and grateful for it, thanks so much.

@Laura,
You're not old 😁
You are never too old to try Remote Viewing.
You are never too old to be a Remote Viewer.
Any age is a great age to learn Remote Viewing.

@Laura
now that's an outdated belief system haha

I have this feeling that Remote Viewing has absolutely nothing to do with age. Its all a heart, soul, Isbe, and meditation kind of thing. Its I suspect just a mood, its a connection to the universe sort of thing. Del is think is right.

@ Del and everyone thanks for the encouragement I’ll make and find more so called “time” in my everyday schedule as we all know time only exists when we create it 😉🙏🏻🫶🏻

Laura, you're only a couple of years older than me (in this incarnation). I only started a few weeks ago!

I did some reading, and I've just found one methodology that I'm learning from/trying to follow. Spending only a few minutes a day to do one short stage-session.... and that's it! (granted, as I go through more stages, each session is going to take longer.. but when you're very familiar with each stage and what you're doing, then just keep your hand in with a practice target once a week).