It is probably too late for the project proper, but this topic is a good one for us to identify to which extent ETs can interfere directly by proxy (or with a cover story). Instead of the crucifixion event itself, lets try to look at the so called miracles that were performed. Given how they made such an impact to create what we known today as primitive Christianism then it is likely that something happened indeed.

The question is then, what actually happened? Was he a front to someone else? Was he hybrid or genetically engineered? How much he knew about who was behind him? What else was happening around him that could not be seen with the naked eye? Could he have been some type of what we would recognize nowadays as a channeler? Who was the actual being pulling the strings while he performed his feats? Who was the one he refereed to as the father?

Well this remindes me of The apparition of Fatima project.

These are all interesting questions.

Except... 'miracles' were a dime a dozen back then. And they've been found throughout all of the world's religions and cultures... so, why simply focus on only one religious icon?

Remember that the Jesus narrative is basically stolen from a number of others- there's nothing particularly original about it.

Well the notion of not existing a particularly original remindes me of Shamanism, many of these religions bring something from this knowledge, even Egyptian times as much Sumerian era, even i as a somewhat practitioner am questioning this knowledge and it's origins.
Although it remindes me also of the project "War in Heavens" where there was a being channeling information to a human, like scriptures, if i understood correctly, this taking into account that it happened million of years ago, and this is only on earth. I wonder if every religion although created by the oppressive societies are also reflections of the way of living of each ET race and the use of the energy life force of each human IS-BE to feed "field".

Courtney, in case you followup the investigations, take note that the one who we call the Christ not being the same as the one being crucified is not news. Leadbeater mentioned this in his book "The Masters and The Path". For that matter he also mentioned that the historical person we knew (probably Yeshua) was not him, but was his proxy. This is one of the reasons why one of my questions was about channeling, although the method described by Leadbeater is not exactly what we would call channeling, it is more akin to direct control or consciousness swapping. Also, targeting directly the name "Yeshua" is also not ideal unless we intend to clarify things about that historical person in particular.

"Instead of the crucifixion event itself, lets try to look at the so called miracles that were performed. Given how they made such an impact to create what we known today as primitive Christianism then it is likely that something happened indeed.

The question is then, what actually happened? Was he a front to someone else? Was he hybrid or genetically engineered? How much he knew about who was behind him? What else was happening around him that could not be seen with the naked eye? Could he have been some type of what we would recognize nowadays as a channeler? Who was the actual being pulling the strings while he performed his feats? Who was the one he refereed to as the father?"

But.... do we actually *need* some sort of intermediary to perform such things? What makes you (and most of the rest of the planet) think that we can't do those things ourselves?

We "know"* that as an IS-BE, we're capable of transmigration between life-forms. And, we're capable of ESP and Remote Viewing, Remote Influencing, Healing, Telepathy, general Clairvoyance. And it's been strongly suggested by those 'in the know' (who probably do know) that we're basically babies at these sorts of things.

(* "Know" for a given definition... there is solid evidence that is statistically significant and reliable that there are at least *some* of those abilities present in the human population)

Shiningbrow, it is not about what we can do. It is about how the history has been manipulated and how those that work behind the stage do their job.

"It is about how the history has been manipulated and how those that work behind the stage do their job."

First, one should find out what that actual history was! Then figure out what has (or hasn't) been manipulated.

If we're all capable of performing miracles, then the 'manipulation' (of those specific examples) becomes more negligible, certainly at that point in time. (in which case, you'd need to look further into the future for the manipulation)

Manipulation relating to the suppression of knowledge of our inherent abilities is certainly a topic, but harder to find specific (and relevant) instances.