I do think the common dictionary differences in our words on this prison planet with this language has been subtly designed to fool us. So it can pay to rethink some definitions. But I would be cautious to clarify differences between what definitions you've found vs what definitions you believe would better structure the essence of the concept we are considering.
I think changing our prison paradigm will include, yes, rethinking this whole language (or common languaged) and our usage
@Tazz
I was reading in that Anton Parks Girku book series about how EnKi/Asar fragmented the language of the humans in the beginning so that they couldn't be controlled by just one group. Hence, if we all ended up with a worldwide language, and Chrislam (worldwide religion), and one world government, then we would be much more easily controllable. Right now there are 1.5 billion English speakers and 1.1 billion Mandarin speakers with Hindi third at 605 million (830 million if you count Urdu) and Spanish at around 550 - 560 million.
Right now, the governments are all calling for "false" unity. They want us all as one so we would be easier to control. This was done on GLP as well about 1.5 to 2 years ago and GLP being a think tank for Tavistock they wanted to see how the people would react.
Yes it's a 2 part game that plays over and over
1. Introduce systems that are subtly designed to convolute everything
2. Introduce a solution that solves many problems and centralizes control, simultaneously leading back to 1.