ASK FARSIGHT ANYTHING - HOST: INTYSAM (SEPTEMBER) - Farsight Forums

Hi Intysam!
I am so sorry I was off-grid all September and missed this great opportunity…
But since you seem to be the only one actually reading and answering all the questions here (and giving really, really helpful answers - I have just read all your responses here and learned a lot), I will try my luck by asking you this: Can you please read the below, and if you agree, forward it to dr Courtney? Its not a question but a kind request.
Thank you very much!
———-
Hi Courtney!
We have spoken before, I am an Orthopedic Surgeon from Greece, donated a few times and now a paid subscriber. I am writing to you for something really important in my view, and I hope you read this and reply - or even better, act to improve your work.
So, I really believe in your work, watch everything you do and I know for sure that all sessions are blind, valid and valuable. Nevertheless, no skeptic will even be convinced if you are not scientific in your approach. You say in each video that conditions are “clean and scientific”, yet in practice you are not disclosing a lot of things. This keeps skeptic people away and I have trouble convincing people about your work. Can you please do a simple thing and in each project disclose the exact e-mail viewers get (no e-mail address visible of course) and any additional directions the viewers get? That would really help a lot! So, take the ‘’Grays’’ project for example. In the project description page there are 3 focuses. Yet a couple of viewers describe a 4th focus: “Bill the Gray”. Why haven’t you said from the beginning that there was a 4th focus? Also in the same project many viewers do an emotional scale for the grays. It’s obvious that you have asked for it - yet did not disclose it. I can refer to many similar examples in other projects as well (viewers were obviously instructed to to timelines and other exercises that were never disclosed). So, even though I know this work is really valid and amazing, you loose much of the credibility by saying that this is clean, yet not disclosing everything. So, please, please! Post the exact e-mail the viewers got in each and every project, plus any additional instructions they got, and also if a monitor was present in their sessions - disclose everything! You could also do this for past project, many people will appreciate this!
Thank you very much and waiting for you reply.
All the best, Dimitrios

Courtney Brown Mod

2 months ago

Hi Dimitrios! This is Courtney. All Farsight sessions are conducted solo under Instrument Blinding Protocols, which we have described in the past, and in the SRV section on Farsight.org. The viewers work off of a script that has nonleading movement exercises, such as move to focus 2, move to subject B, and so on. The viewers are given the movement exercises in the script sequentially, not all at once. So they do not know what movement exercise will be coming next when they are doing their sessions. In the two cases you mention above regarding Bill the Gray, in those cases a final fourth movement exercise to Focus 4 was added because the viewers had enough energy to continue for a bit longer. In the other situations, the viewers were too exhausted to go further. For those who got that far, the exact wording they were given is: "Focus 4: Move to Subject F in current time and describe". Thanks for asking the question!

Dimitrios Moschos

2 months ago

Dear dr Courtney,
Thank you very much for personally answering my request!
I do know that this is the case and all exercises and focuses are non-leading, I know that because of my experience with RV. But my point is that good science requires everything to be disclosed, everything. You cannot post any scientific paper without describing in detail your methods and exactly what you did. So, once again, it will greatly add to the scientific validity of this work (and help convince skeptics) if in each and every project description, all movement exercises and any other direction the viewers got is fully and accurately described - exactly as it was given and in the order it was given. Thank you very much again!
All the best,
Dimitrios