I think continuation of this thread is pointless...certainly for me (and anyone with even the faintest hint of critical thinking).

The simplest thing - a link, or even just a case hearing number - are too far beyond those advocating for something that is clearly BS - and now there's a whole massive conspiracy in which any case that's actually won is now hidden away so no-one can ever find it (nor any hints about its existence, such as a time, place, plaintiff's name, etc are unable to be provided) - while I can easily look up and find numerous cases where they've lost...

And, somehow, pulling up the ToS of a single private company apparently proves something that's completely unrelated to the actual topic at hand.... is going to convince someone of its validity??? I'm at a complete loss as to how that's supposed to work....

You have already factually been given the «simplest» _direction_ which is to go to a damn library, head to the «law» section of said library, then look through the books for yourself; whether you find anything to your liking or not is another matter;

Regardless of what you «believe» regarding the «official» stories, I mean, sure, you can «believe» the «official» stories about 9/11, JFK, etc., just like you can «believe» that the «official transcripts» resulted in the «Defendant» losing the case (even though he actually «won» the case in reality).

Unless you actually SEE IT WITH YOUR OWN EYES, similar to taking one's own photographs of UAPs, rather than demanding for «evidence» like a pseudo-skeptic, you simply aren't doing much more than «surface-level» investigation; better yet, GET yourself INTO a «court-case» where YOU are the «Defendant» then make SURE to ask the «judge» if you see a gold-fringed flag at the front of the room whether it happens to be a flag of admiralty or maritime, for and on the official public-record; AND DO NOT LET HIM DODGE THE QUESTION; it's been reported that, when someone did this, they «officially» had to find him «guilty» but, towards the end of the hearing, the «judge» talked to the Defendant & said that they would actually be dismissing the case & dropping all charges (apparently whispering to him very quietly), but, they had to make it «look» like he «lost» before the eyes of the rest of the public; just to make sure I put this into more context, they said they would let him go free, but, just don't ask about that flag, they were insistent.

And a «conspiracy theory» used as a derogatory term is nothing more than a LAZY man's way to NOT bother «FIELD-TESTING» claims FOR HIMSELF; I did read about someone's experiences, and, was mentioned towards the end of the previous paragraph, something which I later on did field-test for myself.

Hmmm. I just thought of another very good reason for these things.

It's to keep track of your state pension. You pay in, eventually maybe, you get to withdraw.

Of course, if people are withdrawing before their retirement age, well, that could shrink the economy some. Because each bit of currency can only be exchanged for less goods or services.

And of course, a record is ALWAYS kept of such transactions. Hopefully it's all on block chain now. Or if not now, very very soon.

Such records are, of course, permanent.

Anyway, I'm not going to tell people what to do here. It depends on your own personal situation, and if you think money can solve any problem, well, it doesn't. I've come across any number of rich kids with huge problems, and a few old rich people also with big problems.